rdKNIGHTMAREZ, on November 27 2012 - 01:00 PM, said:
actually im fighting back against the very arrogance you speak of.
No you're not fighting back.
What you are doing is getting into a pissing match.
Quote
Im saying that dual weilding weapons will be fun and make the game better. then some guy comes along and , without knowing anything about me, says '' to be blunt you are dead wrong''.
You know, when you quote something somebody says to prove a point, the ethical thing to do is
actually quote what they say. Instead, you just make up a quote that helps your argument, and what_
Are you just hoping nobody would notice that_
Quote
level of arrogance_ don't have a proper understanding of hawkens mechanics_ EpeeN_
Wtf are you talking about.
Since you persist, I intend on showing you.
Quote
some guy told me dual weilding wouldn't work, and talked down to me.
And so you decided to react in the most childish manner possible_
Quote
I show a video showing the kind of skill i put out as a pilot.
Your proof of being a "skilled" pilot is you barely winning a 1v1 in a pub game that is only similar Hawken in the fact that you pilot mechs and shoot while moving in a 3D environment.
Show me a video of you at least holding your own against BuDeKai, NotKjell or even anybody who's just "fairly good" at Hakwen and maybe I'll start to believe you've got some relevant skill.
Until then, you've got nothing.
Quote
and now i have some intellect thinking he is psyhic and putting words in my mouth.
What_
Quote
ok you want evidence dual weilding works out fine balance wise_
How about almost every mech game created since the front mission on the snes_
how about the some dps graph showing that dual weilding doesn't dodps that is equlivent to the current weapon load outs_
how about the many many pilot's who want to do it because its fun_
how about the ideas about geometry of combat, and paper-sissor-rock mechanics_
How about you
actually provide evidence and solid facts instead of just hinting that they exist.
Quote
end of the day: having more options that are balanced = better game.
Sure.
But you still haven't proved that dual wielding can be balanced, or show how it would be balanced.
Quote
being able to dual weild..smgs for example, would give me excellent dps at short to medium range.
however without the tow i wouldn't be able to hit people around corners , deal with deployed turrets with one shot, or have any kind of accurate long range 'pokes'.
And using an SMG plus direct hitting a TOW gives me excellent dps as short to medium range, but I also won't overheat nearly as fast as you, plus I can still hit you around cover.
So far, all you've done is prove that dual wielding would actually be
inferior to the standard loadout.
Why implement a game mechanic that is
worse_
Quote
those statements above clearly 'tear you a new one'.
keep the converstaion on topic, not hopelessly trying to mind-read and charactor assasinate.......your betters...
No. No they really don't.
The way you present yourself, I wouldn't even need to try and assassinate your character.
And did you just refer to yourself in the plural_ Is that supposed to be like a "royal we"_
How arrogant and pretentious are you_