9 replies to this topic

[fingerknitter]

Essentially, the way it works is that there are MULTIPLE game modes that are cycled through at random within the same match, and if you have say 5 game modes, the match winner will be the best of 5 winner. They happen one at a time.

Zone control (essentially MA) is a must have for one of the objectives, as would be a TDM objective, and a capture the flag game mode, but what are some other objective game modes that we could incorporate as well_

For those who still don't know what I mean:

Game starts:

First 25% of match time -> Capture the flag (chosen randomly)
Next 25% of match time -> Zone control (missile assault basically) (chosen randomly)
Next 25% of match time -> Both teams compete to get x number of kills (chosen randomly)
Next 25% of match time -> *Maybe an escort objective_ I dunno (chosen randomly)

If any of you have any input on how many game modes there should be, how long the match should last, and what kind of game modes it should include (or...by the off chance...you don't like this idea...why you don't) would be great

Edited by fingerknitter, December 19 2013 - 11:30 PM.

[EliteShooter]

Yea that would be great ! I mean I'm sure CTF is on the way , SG 2.0 too so another new gamemode may not be available soon :/

[fingerknitter]

EliteShooter, on December 20 2013 - 04:30 AM, said:

Yea that would be great ! I mean I'm sure CTF is on the way , SG 2.0 too so another new gamemode may not be available soon :/

We can hope :/ This game mode has a great way of utilizing the ENTIRE map throughout the whole match, which is a lot of fun.

[EliteShooter]

I believe such a game mode will feel a little "unoriginal" and considered as a copy of killzone's killzone mode ... also it might be too complicated for newcomers. I mean some ppl with [3 to 10] still don't know what does AA mean , you feel me _

Personally I'll bee pleased to play such a gamemode ; simply cuz it's diversity can make all kinds of players have fun ; people who like speed , defense , direct fight , pure teamwork ... will all get a good amount of fun in this "killzone" mode so ... good idea !

[fingerknitter]

EliteShooter, on December 20 2013 - 10:30 AM, said:

I believe such a game mode will feel a little "unoriginal" and considered as a copy of killzone's killzone mode ... also it might be too complicated for newcomers. I mean some ppl with [3 to 10] still don't know what does AA mean , you feel me _

Personally I'll bee pleased to play such a gamemode ; simply cuz it's diversity can make all kinds of players have fun ; people who like speed , defense , direct fight , pure teamwork ... will all get a good amount of fun in this "killzone" mode so ... good idea !

Oh I'm sure anyone who's played killzone would recognize it, but honestly, I don't play every shooter with the thought of "how this game ripped off of Cataclysm and Wolfenstein 3D". I like it when my favorite games recognize the best and worst parts of their respective counter parts

[EnergyFlameD]

fingerknitter, on December 19 2013 - 11:29 PM, said:

Essentially, the way it works is that there are MULTIPLE game modes that are cycled through at random within the same match, and if you have say 5 game modes, the match winner will be the best of 5 winner. They happen one at a time.

Zone control (essentially MA) is a must have for one of the objectives, as would be a TDM objective, and a capture the flag game mode, but what are some other objective game modes that we could incorporate as well_

For those who still don't know what I mean:

Game starts:

First 25% of match time -> Capture the flag (chosen randomly)
Next 25% of match time -> Zone control (missile assault basically) (chosen randomly)
Next 25% of match time -> Both teams compete to get x number of kills (chosen randomly)
Next 25% of match time -> *Maybe an escort objective_ I dunno (chosen randomly)

If any of you have any input on how many game modes there should be, how long the match should last, and what kind of game modes it should include (or...by the off chance...you don't like this idea...why you don't) would be great

I agree totally!

[Emagas]

Before you clarified that they happened one at a time, I actually thought you meant it would be all at the same time. That would be potentially awesome/hilarious, especially if it was done with larger teams.

[fingerknitter]

Emagas, on December 22 2013 - 07:01 PM, said:

Before you clarified that they happened one at a time, I actually thought you meant it would be all at the same time. That would be potentially awesome/hilarious, especially if it was done with larger teams.

You know what, when I changed it, I had a thought of multiple SIMULTANEOUS OBJECTIVES + MAYHEM SERVERS lol. I feel like that's a lot less likely to happen xD

[Nazgulgnome]

This would work really well for campaign style gaming if the meta-game were to expand.  It would be super fun.

[fingerknitter]

Nazgulgnome, on January 12 2014 - 07:33 PM, said:

This would work really well for campaign style gaming if the meta-game were to expand.  It would be super fun.

I'm a tad confused by this.