C-Class Brawler remove turret ablity and change alt primary
#1
Posted November 01 2012 - 12:33 PM
I would like to see the brawler's changed from a turret to more of a combat defence mode instead of turning into a turret only half the armor plate comes down allowing for movement and side boosting.
This is can also be used to change the look of the brawler and give each of the current C Class mechs ther own identiy which at the moment ther kinda like twins with diffrent guns by removeing half the armor plate
from the brawler the one that would cover the primary weapon slot.
something along the lines of when used the mech gets
set precentage increase to the primary guns rate of fire
set precentage decrease to the damage taken
no health regen
cost more fuel to use boost movement
slowed movement but increase turn rate
secondary weapon becomes unuseable due to the sheild blocking its path of fire
As for the secondary alt it does not fit the brawler class at all this is a close combat mech
I would switch the alt primary to either the vulcan or the assault rifle the vulcan would fit the heavy
class.
#2
Posted November 01 2012 - 12:43 PM
The SA Hawkins and Turret Mode don't feel like they compliment the Brawler
Though I think having a different slowdown ability would cause the same issue
I would appreciate a +ROF ability though you'd have to be careful when dealing with the % increase
#3
Posted November 01 2012 - 12:50 PM
its just if we are gona remove the turret mode then we gota get rid of those armor plates then it just looks like a Fat assault mech runing around.
for the brawler turret mode is a contradiction to its name and its setup for the rocketeer it fits more but still needs adjustments.
#4
Posted November 01 2012 - 02:28 PM
#5
Posted November 01 2012 - 09:09 PM
The defensive idea is still good, but I think he should retain more mobility than what is offered by turret mode. OP's idea was interesting in the 'half-shield' aspect, gaining more reduction, but still able to pace forward and in different directions. For some reason the image of the marine with combat shield pops into my mind.
Maybe take those huge back wings the Brawler has to move them forward into 'shielded' mode. Attacks made to the front 180 degrees of the brawler would do considerably less damage, the back 180 would still take full. The shield is offset by reduced mobility. I wouldn't mind the activation/deactivation time as long as I could move while this is happening.
Another ability idea to put in place of the turret mode for Brawler could be Charge. Yes, it's unoriginal but it is the staple of any barbarian type class (of which the brawler most represents).
- Charge: Rushes your mech forward X amount of meters. This doesn't use Fuel since it is a long cooldown special ability. If the brawler connects with a mech at the end of it, it also damages/pushes them aside (shakes their screen as well_)
I am matter... I am antimatter... I can see your past... I can see your future...
#6
Posted November 02 2012 - 03:56 AM
Also, I wouldn't use an ability that removed my capability to use both my weapons. I rely totally on packing a big heavy punch and I use everything I have to do so. If the shield blocked my secondary I wouldn't use it. I love the idea tho. The shields could just slide over the front of the body like Bumble Bee's yellow mask in transformers. Then you have bonus front armour, reduced speed, fractionally and still regular armour rear and side so you can charge in but have to be cautious you don't get flanked.
#7
Posted November 02 2012 - 08:09 AM
Edited by TheChaffeemancer, November 02 2012 - 08:16 AM.
#8
Posted November 02 2012 - 11:18 AM
TheChaffeemancer, on November 02 2012 - 08:09 AM, said:
It made the Brawler a beast at CQC, and allowed for it to still remain a threat at mid range. It asserted the Brawler's dominance in close quarters, which is what you would expect from a mech called the Brawler.
[HWK]HUGHES, on July 03 2013 - 11:07 PM, said:
The Sinful Infil HEAT Cannon Hustler, Cloaking and Smoking, C-Class Swagger, Ballin' n' Brawlin'
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users