I really find that TDM games are much less fun the more people are on the server, it 's like: more ppl == less skill.
For those who wanna play the game but hate mechballing any chance to get a "small" TDM servers? like 4v4 or 3v3?
please?
I really find that TDM games are much less fun the more people are on the server, it 's like: more ppl == less skill.
For those who wanna play the game but hate mechballing any chance to get a "small" TDM servers? like 4v4 or 3v3?
please?
Yes plz. 3v3 & 4v4 etc. are fun but not when someone has to sit out in a corner.


Yes, the less players the better. Less players means an individual ahs more power to influence the outcome and kills actually are worth something within a battle.
+1
- Sitting next to the sound box in Last Eco -
I think this would make people more skilled not less. Right now it is basically stay in a team focus fire on everything you see and if the other team is broke up you death ball.
I like the idea of smaller games another reason maybe it would fix the crazy lag I am getting where i do not know where i am much less where the enemy is.
I think this would make people more skilled not less. Right now it is basically stay in a team focus fire on everything you see and if the other team is broke up you death ball.
I like the idea of smaller games another reason maybe it would fix the crazy lag I am getting where i do not know where i am much less where the enemy is.
Check your radar.
Smaller maps do have their advantages but 6v6 still works best (imo)
3v3 games can be too easy, especially when it allows you to focus on your target w/o worrying about who might be sneaking up on you.
Smaller population games can frequently degenerate into clusters of 1v1 shootouts, or DM style ganging up, until one team gets out of coord because of spawning/rejoining delays. Essentially, whoever is behind in the first 30 seconds will lose the game. This is likely one reason why a full match size of 6 per team in TDM has consistently worked well--and originally everyone wanted bigger match populations.
MEATBALL
with a "vote to lock" system you could have good 3vs3 servers.
But yes, few smaller server could be fun
Edited by MomOw, 15 June 2015 - 08:25 PM.
Custom servers to be able to create custom matches. Player that starts the match in that server would make the rules..i.e..# of players on a team, what mechs are allowed, items, internals, etc.
*+
I have been vocal about larger games but that is because the maps are to small to pull it off Get bigger maps and i could be for larger mass mech games
Custom servers to be able to create custom matches. Player that starts the match in that server would make the rules..i.e..# of players on a team, what mechs are allowed, items, internals, etc.
*+
I like this idea it would give harken players more freedom to play how they want . How could this be bad ?
Check your radar.
Smaller maps do have their advantages but 6v6 still works best (imo)
3v3 games can be too easy, especially when it allows you to focus on your target w/o worrying about who might be sneaking up on you.
^This
The thing I [love to] hate is just when I think i'm going to clean up a couple of weakened enemies, their teammates who were off radar walk out and stomp me. Well played. Punnishment of tunnel vision.
Not knowing where the other 2-3 enemies are means you have to play smarter.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users