Be critical please and tell me what you think.
Edited by Shade__, 05 August 2016 - 01:40 PM.
Edited by Shade__, 05 August 2016 - 01:40 PM.
,d88b.d88b,
88888888888
`Y8888888Y'
`Y888Y'
`Y
-Shade__
I think HAWKEN is doomed.
The PC community is the red headed step child Reloaded never wanted but got saddled with when they married the PC community's mother.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Shoutout to mah real Africans out there.
I think HAWKEN is doomed.
I can save Howken !
...
Armor : 325...
Are you sure? Less armor than Tech?
Also, does the buff/debuff stack on each shot? If yes, then can I literally immobilize somebody with it? Or turn my teammates into Sonic?
Either way, I would not want to see the speed at which Raider will move with this buff on. Or Scout. I don't think that the idea of changing the movement speed dynamically can be tied in the exsisting Hawken. It can't be countered that easily and with proper communication this buff/debuff will creates situations of basically free kills on targets who can't run away. And now imagine if both teams have such a mech on each side. Basically it will turn into a game of "Who's aim is better this time". Considering your targets are slowed down this will hardly be a challenge.
This is a bad idea. The mech that can be countered only by itself. If the game had mechanics to change the movement speed at any time for any mech, then this buff/debuff would make sense. Otherwise it's a mess even in theory.
Or you're trying to say that it will have a maximum 10% buff/debuff. Then it's just worthless.
P.S.:
I think HAWKEN is doomed.
Constructive as always. Or may be it's just a meme. Either your opinions are bad or your memes are bad. I don't even know what's worse.
Edited by I2DI, 05 August 2016 - 12:30 PM.
I simply cease to believe that something is OP just because it's OP.
Edits
Added stacking twice
Armor went up from 325 to 330
Reduced time from 4 seconds to 2 seconds
,d88b.d88b,
88888888888
`Y8888888Y'
`Y888Y'
`Y
-Shade__
I think control of movement or movement altering mechs should be based around brief instances of advantage as opposed to sustained minor advantages
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users