It seems that a huge portion of people who write reviews about Hawken are using information that is ~3 years old.
maybe, but these reviews still contain info like: "hawken is p2w", and "if compared MWO and Hawken, hawken is sux and just a game in which you can play two days, and return to mechwarrior...", blablabla...
I made topic about this on old-forum, where i copy most bad comments/reviews (and some good) where journalists compared hwk with mwo, and about hawken main problems, with analysys, what gamers whos jump in hawken dislike. for example, most of people hate fred, and some hawken weapons. i suggest swap assault and fred many times ago, because many people love assault and bruiser appearance, or change one mech from A, B, or C. but ADH doesn't care.
thus list contain many things, which seems normal for us (hawken fans) but look very bad for most of ordinary players. also, some of points was speed/dodge, and frustating fact that this game not a mech-simulator.
people look early game trailers from closed alpha/beta, or look some screenshots in google, and they think: "hell yeah, it is a mech-game of my dream!"
but when they start play in hawken, they very fast understand that this game is very very far from things, which they see in trailer and wanted to play...
this is frustating. because previous devs have removed a huge number of "features" that are created from hawken - Hawken.
Edited by nepacaka, 27 October 2015 - 10:03 PM.