I still do not agree with the whole "Tech is OP argument". It's one of very few mechs who are actually unique and require more than COD point-and-shoot to work. It truly annoys me when I see the amount of mechs that require simple point-and-shoot tactics to win.
I honestly don't agree with the "Tech is OP argument" either, but you don't even need to point at someone to "shoot" the healing.
I play on 110 FOV and can heal people outside of my field of view.
That's worse than point-and-shoot in my opinion - even though I don't care that much, I figured I'd point this out for the uninformed.
You also seem to be really biased towards the Tech imo;
- Tech doesn't require good accuracy as much as other viable mechs due to the current mechanics of the Secondary.
Players with a horrid accuracy can score much higher than usual because of it.
It does require good accuracy for the Primary, yet the bread-and-butter of the Tech is the Secondary.
- Literally every viable mech requires more than good accuracy to work.
Atleast, in high-MMR matches.
For clarification, I just want to point out that you seem biased in my eyes, and why it seems so.
Edited by (KDR) Meraple, 26 October 2015 - 06:11 AM.