How to set refresh rate_
#1
Posted March 20 2013 - 12:49 PM
Thx for your advice
#2
Posted March 22 2013 - 08:17 AM
To actually see those 120hz you need a GPU that can handle Hawken at 120fps. You can't really overclock a monitor to preform better than what it is.
#3
Posted March 22 2013 - 10:41 AM
(To avoid tearing you can use VSync with a CRT.)
#4
Posted March 22 2013 - 11:34 AM
What are your system specs anyway_ OS, Processor, RAM, Video card name and driver version_
Me Built PC | Win 8 Pro | AMD Phenom II X4 B60 | Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 (314.22) | 8GB DDR3
DESKTOP CLEAN Nvidia Driver Install | LAPTOP CLEAN Nvidia Driver Install | PhysX Helpful Info
#5
Posted March 22 2013 - 11:38 AM
Its not about lowering the resolution, I bet 60Hz at ANY resolution i tried. It's a 21" and it can handle 85Hz at 1600x1200, 100Hz at 1280x0124x 120Hz at 1024x768 and 160Hz below. I tried on 1280x1024 and 1600x1200, every time 60Hz.
My sytem specs have nothing to do with the refresh rate of the monitor. Please dont confuse this with FPS, it has nothing to do with that.
Windows 7 64bit Pro
Intel i5 760 2,8@3,6GHz
8 GB RAM
NVidia GTX 560 Ti OC (OC by default from vendor, performs like a 570), newest beta driver.
But as I sad: my specs are not the problem, just that the game does not let me choose a decent refresh rate for my CRT.
Edited by Morgenstern72, March 22 2013 - 11:46 AM.
#6
Posted March 22 2013 - 11:44 AM
Now games are written for lcd, the refresh rate of 60 Hz and lock fps to 30. Playing at 60 hz refresh is very unpleasant on the CRT.
Edited by KaszaWspraju, March 22 2013 - 12:13 PM.
INTEL i5-4670K * ASUS Z87-A * GOODRAM DDR3 2x4GB * GIGABYTE GTX 760 OC rev 2.0 * X-Fi XTREME MUSIC * GRADO SR-60
SAMSUNG EVO 120GB * OCZ STEALTHXSTREAM 2 600W * Win 7 64
@ defekt : Mobility is King and burst damage is Queen. Checkmate.
Gdy byłem młodszy byłem bardziej beztroski... aha... nie lubię już POLSKI !
#7
Posted March 22 2013 - 07:02 PM
#8
Posted March 23 2013 - 01:35 AM
I can not remember a game too where there was not a menu or settings file where this could not be done.
It's not a problem wiht windows, my monitor or my drivers. The setting is simply missing in Hawken...
#9
Posted March 23 2013 - 01:47 AM
hendman, on March 22 2013 - 07:02 PM, said:
Edited by KaszaWspraju, March 23 2013 - 01:48 AM.
INTEL i5-4670K * ASUS Z87-A * GOODRAM DDR3 2x4GB * GIGABYTE GTX 760 OC rev 2.0 * X-Fi XTREME MUSIC * GRADO SR-60
SAMSUNG EVO 120GB * OCZ STEALTHXSTREAM 2 600W * Win 7 64
@ defekt : Mobility is King and burst damage is Queen. Checkmate.
Gdy byłem młodszy byłem bardziej beztroski... aha... nie lubię już POLSKI !
#10
#11
Posted March 23 2013 - 01:56 AM
INTEL i5-4670K * ASUS Z87-A * GOODRAM DDR3 2x4GB * GIGABYTE GTX 760 OC rev 2.0 * X-Fi XTREME MUSIC * GRADO SR-60
SAMSUNG EVO 120GB * OCZ STEALTHXSTREAM 2 600W * Win 7 64
@ defekt : Mobility is King and burst damage is Queen. Checkmate.
Gdy byłem młodszy byłem bardziej beztroski... aha... nie lubię już POLSKI !
#12
Posted March 23 2013 - 02:03 AM
And I know some gamers that still use theirs because of being able to choose any resolution without quality loss, no problems with slow monitors, no probleme with viewing angels...you name it. I too have the same model a second time, so if my first one goes dead, I jsut swap to the next one. And the first one I have is no working for ~10 years.
How LCD/TFT screen could ever be made to sel better than CRT I cannot understand. Other than being smaller and lighter they have no advantage. And that's not why you use a monitor, but to get a good picture
But sadly games like this add a problem that only CRT owner have but would be super easy to solve...it they want.
Edited by Morgenstern72, March 23 2013 - 02:06 AM.
#13
Posted March 23 2013 - 02:15 AM
Edited by KaszaWspraju, March 23 2013 - 02:20 AM.
INTEL i5-4670K * ASUS Z87-A * GOODRAM DDR3 2x4GB * GIGABYTE GTX 760 OC rev 2.0 * X-Fi XTREME MUSIC * GRADO SR-60
SAMSUNG EVO 120GB * OCZ STEALTHXSTREAM 2 600W * Win 7 64
@ defekt : Mobility is King and burst damage is Queen. Checkmate.
Gdy byłem młodszy byłem bardziej beztroski... aha... nie lubię już POLSKI !
#14
Posted March 23 2013 - 02:36 AM
#15
Posted March 23 2013 - 09:11 AM
I have a Lacie Electron22blue that i dont use anymore, but that monitor was a joy to use in its time: i think it reached 1600x1200@100Hz, however in gaming i mainly used it at 1280x1024@100Hz or something like that because at that time graphic cards couldnt cope well at higher resolutions for high FPS.
best part: i got that monitor used for 55 US dollars and its retail price was 700+
#16
Posted March 23 2013 - 10:05 AM
Manoloco, on March 23 2013 - 09:11 AM, said:
http://i47.tinypic.com/3493ubc.jpg
http://images37.foto...b5d0f47f4a7.png
This is missing in the graphics settings Hawken
Edited by KaszaWspraju, March 23 2013 - 10:11 AM.
INTEL i5-4670K * ASUS Z87-A * GOODRAM DDR3 2x4GB * GIGABYTE GTX 760 OC rev 2.0 * X-Fi XTREME MUSIC * GRADO SR-60
SAMSUNG EVO 120GB * OCZ STEALTHXSTREAM 2 600W * Win 7 64
@ defekt : Mobility is King and burst damage is Queen. Checkmate.
Gdy byłem młodszy byłem bardziej beztroski... aha... nie lubię już POLSKI !
#17
Posted March 23 2013 - 11:42 AM
#18
Posted March 23 2013 - 01:55 PM
KaszaWspraju, on March 23 2013 - 10:05 AM, said:
Manoloco, on March 23 2013 - 09:11 AM, said:
http://i47.tinypic.com/3493ubc.jpg
http://images37.foto...b5d0f47f4a7.png
This is missing in the graphics settings Hawken
You can say it directly to me i dont mind, you can leave the rest of people alone.
But you are partially wrong and partially right, executables sometimes bypass W7 refresh rate, i do know and understand this, just forgot about it because the solution is very simple, you can force the refresh rates:
http://hardforum.com...d.php_t=1663033
https://forums.gefor...s-into-120-hz-/
edit: i used reforce in the xp days but that doesnt work on w7 the links i posted above have solutions for w7
edit2: Morgenstern72 you reminded me one of the reasons i prefer LCDs now, reading is a LOT more comfortable than on CRTs
Edited by Manoloco, March 23 2013 - 01:58 PM.
#19
Posted March 25 2013 - 04:07 PM
#20
Posted March 25 2013 - 06:23 PM
I tried scouring the internet, but I found few resources that may or may not help your situation. The CRT is just not cared about by newer games simply because it's obsolete technology. Does it mean that the LCD is superior than the CRT in every regard_ No, but I'm simply stating the way things are, otherwise you wouldn't be asking for help.
The only things I found were ways to force custom resolutions for your desktop via the Nvidia control panel. But it doesn't work for games. So I guess you could run the game in a borderless, windowed mode and that way the game will most likely obey the desktop refresh rate. Another thing I found is messing around with the monitor's EDID via the ini config and removing all the 60hz, 70hz, 72hz, and 75hz refresh rates for THE Resolution you run the game at. This way the game will have no choice but to use whatever it sees first and that will be the 85Hz. BUT messing around with this could damage your CRT if you don't know what you're doing, which means if you force a higher refresh rate at a particular resolution that your monitor cannot handle, then trouble occurs. Newbish, amateurish stuff but spelling mistakes can occur.
But here's the kicker: IF Hawken is forcing a particular refresh rate at the application level, then doing the above will HAVE NO EFFECT! I doubt they are, but just sayin' it's a possibility. Finally I have this forum in which people there are crazy about forcing 120Hz on their games. So if they're forcing 120Hz, maybe they can help you force 85Hz. But they go on a game-to-game basis, so I don't know if they can do their magic for Hawken. Anyway, register there and ask your question. Might as well since they're more expert in this department than anyone here. Speaking of, the link:-
http://120hz.net/forum.php
Me Built PC | Win 8 Pro | AMD Phenom II X4 B60 | Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 (314.22) | 8GB DDR3
DESKTOP CLEAN Nvidia Driver Install | LAPTOP CLEAN Nvidia Driver Install | PhysX Helpful Info
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users