Free 3600 mc every day
#381
Posted February 07 2014 - 02:47 PM
"Can each section be solved individually_ for example, if you had given us only "AtizenegyGQU" would that section be solvable alone with the key, or would it need the whole thing_"
Yes, it can be solved individually.
#382
Posted February 07 2014 - 02:58 PM
Number of syllables didn't seem to work, but I don't speak the language, so its hard to say if I got those right.
Watch me pretend to be good at Hawken (Twitch).
...And recordings thereof (Youtube)
#383
Posted February 08 2014 - 03:12 AM
"kettő" isn't the key
"2" isn't the key
"kettő = 2" is the key
The key can be applied to both
this: AtizenegyGQU-MnegyvenötNötvenegyH-XWQLE-MhatvanPRQ-LQhatvanhárom,százhetvennégyD
and this: AtizenegyGQU
If the key means that "kettő" can be translated to "2" in a different way than language, which way is it_
Count of "t"s_ Nope.
Count of syllables_ Nope
Count of vowels_ Nope
Position of "t" counting from zero_ Nope
Length of kettő is 5, can't be divided by two.
Length of "kettő = 2" is 9, can't be divided by two and is longer than for example "hatvan", which is only 6 chars long. So it doesn't seem to be some kind of positional puzzle either.
"K" is 11th letter in alphabet:
k=11
e=5
t=20
t=20
o=15
-------
sum=71
Just another dead end.
I'm gonna have to ask this:
If "kettő = 2" is the key, can the key also be "ketto = 2" (without those things above "o")_ And what about "kettő:2" (removed spaces and replaced "=" with ":")_ Would that still be a valid key_
EDIT: Also probably wouldnt hurt if we can get together as many used codes as possible, since the code probably has some rules as well. For example I think that you can't find 0 (zero) in the code, because it can easily be mistaken for O ("o"). Also I don't remember seeing any code with 6 numbers in it.
Edited by Zaxik, February 08 2014 - 03:18 AM.
#384
Posted February 08 2014 - 04:14 AM
"ketto = 2" is still a valid key. You had some good ideas, im happy that you forgot the text file and given some thinking instead .
#385
Posted February 08 2014 - 05:32 AM
I especially can't wrap my head around this statement:
"I can tell you one thing: if you find the solution, you will know
that this one will be it. You don't even have to try it,
you would bet money on it blindly."
Kinda makes me feel that it's some cypher you would recognize immediately if you had some previous experience with the same kind... now should I waste my time searching for most common cyphers and learn them_
I sure as hell know that I won't blindly bet money on anything I come up with. Unless I knew for sure what I'm doing, unless I knew the cypher and had previous experiences with the same kind. Which I probably don't. Anything I come up with has equal chance to be the solution and the chance is verrrrrrry close to zero.
EDIT: Just wondering...
If the first part of the code was
AkettoGQU
then the solution to that will be
A2GQU
Right_ Or am I again being completely off_
EDIT2: If every word converts to number and none of them is two or zero and they're all different, then I get about 20000 different combinations gimme a year or two to try them all out
Edited by Zaxik, February 08 2014 - 07:38 AM.
#386
Posted February 08 2014 - 09:17 AM
that this one will be it. You don't even have to try it,
you would bet money on it blindly."
Okay, i have to admit, i might have overrated this a bit, as there vere many viable ideas with "this will be it" feeling . But still, the textfile-deadwrong thing is valid .
#387
Posted February 08 2014 - 09:48 AM
A3GQU-M4N4H-XWQLE-M2PRQ-LQ45D
But forgot how I got it exactly.. dammit.. err.. not even sure if it was this code.. cuz I started editing it before I noticed there is no longer a red cross next to the textfield and noticed I got MC I believe It had something to do with counting letters that are contained in the key, lol...
Great puzzle, lol! Thanks man!
Edited by Zaxik, February 08 2014 - 10:21 AM.
#388
Posted February 08 2014 - 11:14 AM
#389
Posted February 08 2014 - 11:26 AM
Sorry for my english ;P
"Go then. There are other worlds than these"
Jake, Gunslinger
#390
Posted February 08 2014 - 11:33 AM
#391
Posted February 08 2014 - 11:49 AM
aeiouy = 6
ketto = eo = 2
tizenegy = ieey = 4
negyvenot = eyeo = 4
otvenegy = oeey = 4
hatvan = aa = 2
hatvanharom = aaao = 4
szazhetvennegy = aeeey = 5
or:
ketto
k=1
e=1
t=1
o=1
tizenegy = tee = 3
negyvenot = eeot = 4
otvenegy = otee = 4
hatvan = t = 1
hatvanharom = to = 2
szazhetvennegy = etee = 4
That code I posted is probably wrong, as I said, I messed with it before I noticed I succeeded.
Also I'm more in favor of the first solution, cuz the second doesn't need the "2" part. I believe though I was trying the first solution before and it didn't work, but I guess I was so burnt out that I probably overlooked one letter and made a mistake or something like that...
In the end, it really was quite simple. It's really hard to not overthink it.
Edited by Zaxik, February 08 2014 - 11:51 AM.
#392
Posted February 08 2014 - 12:32 PM
Indeed, it is.
"It's really hard to not overthink it. "
You did overthink it . Also, you missed the point. The solution can be phrased in a short sentence, without any special numbers or letters or equations.
#393
Posted February 08 2014 - 12:44 PM
#394
Posted February 08 2014 - 12:57 PM
#395
Posted February 08 2014 - 01:06 PM
Zaxik, on February 08 2014 - 11:49 AM, said:
aeiouy = 6
ketto = eo = 2
tizenegy = ieey = 4
negyvenot = eyeo = 4
otvenegy = oeey = 4
hatvan = aa = 2
hatvanharom = aaao = 4
szazhetvennegy = aeeey = 5
or:
ketto
k=1
e=1
t=1
o=1
tizenegy = tee = 3
negyvenot = eeot = 4
otvenegy = otee = 4
hatvan = t = 1
hatvanharom = to = 2
szazhetvennegy = etee = 4
That code I posted is probably wrong, as I said, I messed with it before I noticed I succeeded.
Also I'm more in favor of the first solution, cuz the second doesn't need the "2" part. I believe though I was trying the first solution before and it didn't work, but I guess I was so burnt out that I probably overlooked one letter and made a mistake or something like that...
In the end, it really was quite simple. It's really hard to not overthink it.
It can't be the first one cause i already tried a couple days ago that solution and it didn't worked
Sorry for my english ;P
"Go then. There are other worlds than these"
Jake, Gunslinger
#396
Posted February 08 2014 - 02:46 PM
#397
Posted February 08 2014 - 03:11 PM
Edited by maross, February 08 2014 - 03:12 PM.
#398
Posted February 08 2014 - 03:30 PM
maross, on February 08 2014 - 03:11 PM, said:
If you'll simply say "that's not the solution, but the result is right" i'll still try to reverse engineer that code^^
It's normal prople presented with a working solution and a result stop working on the enigma. Would you waste your time destroying a puzzle after you completed it, to try again and find a different disposition_
Edited by Fazel, February 08 2014 - 03:31 PM.
Sorry for my english ;P
"Go then. There are other worlds than these"
Jake, Gunslinger
#399
Posted February 08 2014 - 04:14 PM
hatvanharom > hatvan
all numbers unique
none is 2 (cuz ketto is 2)
none is zero (cuz "0" vs "O")
last is largest
...
etc
and if the script output was less than 100 codes, I simply mechanically tried copy&pasting them all one by one...
I really tried absolutely EVERYTHING I could think of. You, as the author of the puzzle, might find the solution obvious, but I really had absolutely no idea what I was supposed to do. And when you don't know, you just try it all. Something might eventually work...
BTW the soul of the puzzle isn't broken completely, you said "time for some serious brain damage", well, that worked...
Edited by Zaxik, February 08 2014 - 04:16 PM.
#400
Posted February 08 2014 - 05:15 PM
i7-3770K//32GB RAM//SSD//R9 270X Vapour
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users