Can we get some closure/feedback from the devs_
#1
Posted October 31 2012 - 07:30 PM
There are a lot of suggestions and a lot of feedback posts and I was just kind of wondering where we stand with them all.
#2
Posted October 31 2012 - 08:07 PM
#3
Posted October 31 2012 - 08:52 PM
#4
Posted November 01 2012 - 09:46 AM
-Excession, Iain M. Banks
#5
Posted November 01 2012 - 11:28 AM
They are going to lose me as a customer if it's not supported on release.
- There is nothing like a Vulture -
#6
Posted November 01 2012 - 11:41 AM
CakeBandit, on October 31 2012 - 07:30 PM, said:
We're digesting! We will be putting out a "state of the game" Producer Letter before CBE2 begins.
#7
Posted November 01 2012 - 11:47 AM
Dbes, on November 01 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
They are going to lose me as a customer if it's not supported on release.
Let's be realistic here.
A coagulated, gloomy thinking in the intelligence, as my major ego.
An antinomian theorem of behaviorism, in all of my thinkings.
It's what we call "The Inversion Impulse."
#8
Posted November 01 2012 - 11:56 AM
Dbes, on November 01 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
They are going to lose me as a customer if it's not supported on release.
This reminds me of how little I miss my Eyefinity set up. Having to "boycott" really good games because I wanted to use ALL the screens, in hindsight, is pretty goofy. There are so many things I'd rather see them work on than try and fix an issue affecting <5% of users. Besides, in competitive FPS the extra FOV is a definite advantage.
But I digress. Looking forward to the official dev update.
Edited by WALSRU, November 01 2012 - 11:59 AM.
#9
#10
Posted November 01 2012 - 12:15 PM
WALSRU, on November 01 2012 - 11:56 AM, said:
Dbes, on November 01 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
They are going to lose me as a customer if it's not supported on release.
This reminds me of how little I miss my Eyefinity set up. Having to "boycott" really good games because I wanted to use ALL the screens, in hindsight, is pretty goofy. There are so many things I'd rather see them work on than try and fix an issue affecting <5% of users. Besides, in competitive FPS the extra FOV is a definite advantage.
But I digress. Looking forward to the official dev update.
I never said I was boycotting it. Hah.
It's just such a simple tweak, and would be rather upsetting to see not included.
- There is nothing like a Vulture -
#11
Posted November 01 2012 - 12:24 PM
Most games that got the first part right still never got the HUD stretch figured out.
Edited by WALSRU, November 01 2012 - 12:25 PM.
#12
Posted November 01 2012 - 12:53 PM
Dbes, on November 01 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
They are going to lose me as a customer if it's not supported on release.
this is something im curious about as well. however. it will still take some reasonable amount of effort on your part. not sure how long youve been in the game but those two topics still stump amd and nvidia, and are often not as easy as changing the res, if you have games on steam you know this.
it will often take a years worth of updates before a (complete) game functions properly with such settings, and considering the income this game generates for the devs i would say that you and i are aways out from getting the last couple of percs from having a multi mon setup. we amount to less than 1% of gamers. and of those gamers that do use it, only about 5% of them know how to go about doing it themselves(after the game is ready for it). for example, BF3 users on nvidia 500 series that are not using the flagship cards still have issues setting up surround and 3d vision
Edited by deceptaclesteve, November 01 2012 - 12:59 PM.
#13
Posted November 02 2012 - 03:49 AM
Dbes, on November 01 2012 - 12:15 PM, said:
It's just such a simple tweak, and would be rather upsetting to see not included.
Again, they will likely add it later if they do. Having it on launch though_ You've got a better chance of watching Elvis pilot a UFO into the Loch Ness Monster, see Bigfoot crawl out of the smoking wreckage, and then flag down a ride home with ET, Lando Calrissian, Haruko Haruhara, and an Arilou Lalee'lay in the Millennium Falcon.
Edited by DarkPulse, November 02 2012 - 03:52 AM.
A coagulated, gloomy thinking in the intelligence, as my major ego.
An antinomian theorem of behaviorism, in all of my thinkings.
It's what we call "The Inversion Impulse."
#14
Posted November 02 2012 - 05:12 AM
DarkPulse, on November 02 2012 - 03:49 AM, said:
But who's flying the Falcon I ask you!
#16
Posted November 02 2012 - 05:50 AM
Subdivision, on November 02 2012 - 05:12 AM, said:
WALSRU, on November 02 2012 - 05:45 AM, said:
Plus, without going into detail too much about my personal past, let's just say I've taken a few guitars to the head before. It's actually kind of amusing... assuming it's done right. If not, you break your neck and that's bad news, kids.
Edited by DarkPulse, November 02 2012 - 05:53 AM.
A coagulated, gloomy thinking in the intelligence, as my major ego.
An antinomian theorem of behaviorism, in all of my thinkings.
It's what we call "The Inversion Impulse."
#17
Posted November 02 2012 - 07:40 AM
DarkPulse, on November 02 2012 - 03:49 AM, said:
Premise ridiculous- Elvis was a pair of clockwork hips with a speaker, incapable of the autonomy required to pilot aerospace craft; and Loch Ness doesn't exist.
Edited by TheChaffeemancer, November 02 2012 - 07:41 AM.
#18
Posted November 02 2012 - 08:46 AM
TheChaffeemancer, on November 02 2012 - 07:40 AM, said:
A coagulated, gloomy thinking in the intelligence, as my major ego.
An antinomian theorem of behaviorism, in all of my thinkings.
It's what we call "The Inversion Impulse."
#19
Posted November 02 2012 - 08:51 AM
DarkPulse, on November 02 2012 - 08:46 AM, said:
TheChaffeemancer, on November 02 2012 - 07:40 AM, said:
You clearly don't understand, Loch is Gaelic for lake (or sea inlet). It's the lake that doesn't exist. The monster does, but it mostly hangs around Drumnadrochit. And a pair of hips cannot even launch an Aerospace craft, it requires 3 limbs.
#20
Posted November 02 2012 - 11:41 AM
TheChaffeemancer, on November 02 2012 - 08:51 AM, said:
A coagulated, gloomy thinking in the intelligence, as my major ego.
An antinomian theorem of behaviorism, in all of my thinkings.
It's what we call "The Inversion Impulse."
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users