Brawler and Rocketeer Turret mode should be switched around_
#1
Posted November 10 2012 - 11:49 AM
Currently, the brawler gets the regenerating turret and Rocketeer has the mobility turret. But think about it, shouldn't it be the other way around_
The Brawler is a CQC mech, and as such, it has to get close and personal. The game revolves around twich reflex and fast dodging. The brawler, a close quarter combatant needs to be able to dodge incoming projectiles. At that close range with your near null maneuverability you are unable to dodge EMPS, HE grenades, TOWs, SABOTS, the works. A small health regen will not help much against a Tow, followed by a pair of HE grenades.
Mobility Turret on the brawler makes a lot more sense, since close cuarter combat is all about mobility and dodging. DPS in this game is way too high for that slow regen to make an impact.
The Rocketeer on the other hand is designed for medium to long range combat. It couldn't care less about increased mobility. He's probably well outside the range of the HE, EMP and grenade launchers, and becomes a harder target for TOWs. Sabot aren't really that big of a deal, since you couldn't dodge them anyways, even without turret mode.
Regen turret on the Roceteer makes a lot more sense. Small armas fire like SMG and Assault rifle, or to an extent SA Hawkins and Slug rifles can no longer chip at its health from a distance with impunity. It actually enforces the use of turret mode for long range support, since it keeps the Rocketeer protected to all but the Sabot, and other high caliber, long range weapons.
No_
#2
Posted November 10 2012 - 11:53 AM
Edited by Conquistador, November 10 2012 - 11:57 AM.
#3
Posted November 10 2012 - 12:16 PM
*sigh*
#4
Posted November 10 2012 - 01:12 PM
#5
Posted November 10 2012 - 01:15 PM
#6
Posted November 10 2012 - 03:36 PM
Still, i think the mechs would work better if the modes switched around
#7
Posted November 10 2012 - 03:53 PM
#8
Posted November 10 2012 - 04:40 PM
#9
Posted November 10 2012 - 07:41 PM
#10
Posted November 10 2012 - 08:14 PM
When I play the brawler I never ever use the turret ability since it's more hurting then useful for me. So a swap and buff would do good indeed.
/T
#11
Posted November 10 2012 - 09:07 PM
A coagulated, gloomy thinking in the intelligence, as my major ego.
An antinomian theorem of behaviorism, in all of my thinkings.
It's what we call "The Inversion Impulse."
#12
Posted November 10 2012 - 10:20 PM
Edited by Hipnox, November 10 2012 - 10:20 PM.
#13
Posted November 11 2012 - 06:31 AM
What is 20% of a single bullet from an AR_ AR does what, 10 damage per bullet_ (BTW I really don't know) so what, taking 2 less damage from each bullet_ Complete and total utter waste. You'd take much less damage overall by simply dashing now and then.
If it was more like 50% reduced damage then I can actually see it being used, but even then I'm not convinced.
#14
Posted November 11 2012 - 06:35 AM
#16
Posted November 12 2012 - 07:40 AM
Example at 0:49 in the video
Edited by Skylead, November 12 2012 - 07:47 AM.
#17
Posted November 12 2012 - 07:58 AM
#18
Posted November 12 2012 - 07:57 AM
DarkPulse, on November 10 2012 - 09:07 PM, said:
You are not noticing the reduced damage, as every single bullet fired is a hit. If you move around and dodge a bit, some bullets are bound to miss.
I agree turret mode is a bit underpowered, could use some fixing.
ConsterMonster, on November 12 2012 - 07:58 AM, said:
True, but the C-mechs don't even have to be in turret mode. If they are, a few hellfire barages/TOW's and a sabot salvo will make short work of em. They can't dodge the incomming rockets and can't repair.
Edited by Spawny, November 12 2012 - 08:00 AM.
Closed Beta 1 C-Class Brawler
Closed Beta 2 A-Class Berzerker
Closed Beta 3 A-Class Scout
#19
Posted November 12 2012 - 09:02 AM
They definitely don't seem to.
A coagulated, gloomy thinking in the intelligence, as my major ego.
An antinomian theorem of behaviorism, in all of my thinkings.
It's what we call "The Inversion Impulse."
#20
Posted November 12 2012 - 09:08 AM
DarkPulse, on November 12 2012 - 09:02 AM, said:
They definitely don't seem to.
Well damn where did I hear that 20% thing..._ Oh well.
Agreed on last part, certainly doesn't seem like anywhere close to 50% let alone 60/65%
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users