And have you read my other justifications besides that little quote that you took out of all the texts I wrote ,
or do you just like to go into one little detail and make a whole story about it like the newspapers do?
Sure I did. Since you apparently want them used in the discussion...
It doesn't always have to be about discussions or whatever or about Hawken/Forum things.
Sounds like what happens in the Official Unofficial Hawken Teamspeak and #hawkenscrim on quakenet already.
But then again, if you don't try anything new just because it's possible but you think you shouldn't just because it's possible, then nothing ever happens.
Trying something new is all fine and dandy, but reinventing the wheel or spending the time to implement something that would (probably?) be used by a very small amount of an already very small community doesn't seem like something that is worth doing.
And also, the cost wouldn't be a severe issue, I'm very sure of that ;-) In fact, it would be insignificant.
Cite?
Do you have access to the bandwidth bills Reloaded gets for running the site? Is it a multi-year contract or a pay as you go? Is is billed by the meg used (upstream, downstream or either/or) or by the number of connections? What about the SQL database on the back end? Does the amount of space used by the DB and the web site factor into the cost? The chat plugin itself, is it 3rd party that integrates into the forum software itself (which may break future forum upgrades), or is it a stand alone thing that is looped in via something like a PHP include statement? How secure is it? How to validate that only Hawken players use it so Reloaded isn't charged for it's use by people who don't even play?
EDIT: I should clarify a bit. I do believe that the bandwidth used by things such as these usually and probably will be a trivial amount. However, that's not the only thing to consider, as I listed above. For all we know, Reloaded is skating on the edge of their allowed bandwidth consumed for the forums now, and any additional would start incurring overage payments or force an increase in the tier of allotment.
Why make an e-mail option and leave a real-time chat option out which makes it easier/faster to communicate?
Again, IRC covers this, as does the multiple different IM clients out there already. Yahoo chat, AIM, and the old grandpa, ICQ? Not to mentioned the unknown about of smaller ones out there...
Also, I feel like making an real-time chat option would make a lot of people more social around here and decrease loneliness.
Writing an e-mail to talk about a problem / cool experience isn't something you do real quickly.
When real-time chatting, you do. So it just improves the way of life , friendships and reduce the negative / supressing feels.
Near real time communication in a text only format is also the cause of many arguments, people getting fired, and a few scandals.
Text only is one of the worst ways to promote friendships and communicate. We loose facial expressions, body language, and tone of voice. At least with something like teamspeak, tone of voice isn't lost, which makes it much easier for others to understand when one is teasing or making a joke, which is one of the reasons why I didn't immediately get kicked out of it one night when I told Conq' that no one liked him because he was adopted. Him and Ash could tell by my tone of voice that I wasn't serious and was joking/teasing.
If I just want to spend some time on this site and be able to chat here with my friends, I feel like I should be able to.
You already can via the PM system, it's just not 'near-real time'.
Btw, ideas are there to be spread and processed, not to be broken down by saying it's excessive to ask something YOU don't think is ok.
That's what is going on now, processing the idea. Others apparently don't agree with your view of the idea.
Anyhow, there is a message service already. Why not make it real-time so that it goes faster and easier? Writing an e-mail for everything you have to say is excessive. And just plain obsolete imo.
Excessive... You have to click/select a button for reply and type in the response, then hit send. That's excessive? You do realize that an IM system is pretty much identical to how email works, just with a lot of the information hidden, right?
Edited by bacon_avenger, 05 June 2015 - 09:36 PM.