
Thank you to Tickle. And SS396? But mostly Tickle...I think.
#41
Posted 20 October 2015 - 01:17 PM

#42
Posted 20 October 2015 - 02:53 PM

#43
Posted 20 October 2015 - 02:55 PM

#44
Posted 20 October 2015 - 04:15 PM

The heat cannon's black shaft throbs with anticipation, shaking, ready to unleash its white hot load. Just a few meters away, the breacher is pulled taut, prepared to enter the frail scout chassis. As the predator rounds the corner, the pilots' eyes meet for a split second, both experiencing the most intimate, if ephemeral, moment of their lifetimes. In perfect unity, the scout and predator unload; heat cannon covering the predator with thick, steaming fury; breacher penetrating the delicate scout chassis deeply with its long rod. The predator covered in a thick burning mess... the scout engulfing the long rod... they burst into the flame of passion and pleasure, transcending to a higher existence.
- Meraple, LaurenEmily, Xacius and 4 others like this
#45
Posted 20 October 2015 - 04:27 PM

The heat cannon's black shaft throbs with anticipation, shaking, ready to unleash its white hot load. Just a few meters away, the breacher is pulled taut, prepared to enter the frail scout chassis. As the predator rounds the corner, the pilots' eyes meet for a split second, both experiencing the most intimate, if ephemeral, moment of their lifetimes. In perfect unity, the scout and predator unload; heat cannon covering the predator with thick, steaming fury; breacher penetrating the delicate scout chassis deeply with its long rod. The predator covered in a thick burning mess... the scout engulfing the long rod... they burst into the flame of passion and pleasure, transcending to a higher existence.
inb4banandcensorship
Edited by ??�?�؃??, 20 October 2015 - 04:28 PM.
#46
Posted 20 October 2015 - 04:32 PM

#47
Posted 20 October 2015 - 09:43 PM

I got no idea what is going on in this thread. This thread is just confusing. I first thought it was some kind of mockery, but then it wasn`t. Can we just get a badge on threads containing sarcasm?
Edited by Sir Aregon, 20 October 2015 - 09:55 PM.
CRITICAL ASSIST

#48
Posted 20 October 2015 - 10:11 PM

I got no idea what is going on in this thread.
That's what makes it so good; anything goes.
#49
Posted 21 October 2015 - 05:22 AM

#50
Posted 21 October 2015 - 05:32 AM

Spoiler
Holy fuzzy bunny I want this
Edited by neon, 21 October 2015 - 05:33 AM.
t
t
CRITICAL
ASSIST
t
t
#51
Posted 21 October 2015 - 05:36 AM

Knife+ceramic plate=ouch
- kaiserschmarrn_ likes this
Ceterum censeo ... bootcamp-servers! &:
#rapidMMR4newaccounts #removethedelay
#morespeed4EOC #lessspread4T-32
#buffG2R #nerfZerk'n'Assault
#dosomethingwithHF #noisesupression4breacher
THANKS FOR THIS AWESOME GAME!
#52
Posted 21 October 2015 - 06:17 AM

Having made experimented with a large number of assorted pizza creations with various permutations of cheese, insta-bread, and sauce, I would like to point out that the selection of bread/crust/dough is crucial to making such things taste as good as they look.
On a note more trenchant to the thread:
Given an arbitrary number of individuals or groups of individuals (both hereafter referred to as "parties") communicating over the internet such that each party believes itself to be in a state of "having a laugh" at the expense of the other (whether by a disparity of emotional investment or intellectual grasp of a subject), how many parties may be simultaneously functionally correct in their belief?
The derivation is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.
- MechFighter5e3bf9, 1uster, Xacius and 1 other like this
#53
Posted 21 October 2015 - 12:37 PM

Having made experimented with a large number of assorted pizza creations with various permutations of cheese, insta-bread, and sauce, I would like to point out that the selection of bread/crust/dough is crucial to making such things taste as good as they look.
On a note more trenchant to the thread:
Given an arbitrary number of individuals or groups of individuals (both hereafter referred to as "parties") communicating over the internet such that each party believes itself to be in a state of "having a laugh" at the expense of the other (whether by a disparity of emotional investment or intellectual grasp of a subject), how many parties may be simultaneously functionally correct in their belief?
That depends on two factors:
1) the egos of members in each party
2) the delusions (often pertaining to ego) of members in each party
TPG-sponsored MLG tryhard potato recording guide.
Someone whose name rhymes with "ZuneAmanda" being a ragequitting casual.
If the leaderboards aren't real, then how can our MMR be real?
#54
Posted 21 October 2015 - 01:33 PM

oh my lord yes
That depends on two factors:
1) the egos of members in each party
2) the delusions (often pertaining to ego) of members in each party
Edited by ticklemyiguana, 21 October 2015 - 01:35 PM.
#55
Posted 21 October 2015 - 02:29 PM

Could you at least spoiler that food gif when you reply to it? My stomach collapses into a dark hole of want and starts to eat itself everytime I see it.
t
t
CRITICAL
ASSIST
t
t
#56
Posted 21 October 2015 - 02:46 PM

PsychadelicGrass
And then you go and do this.
>:c
What's the big fuzzy bunnyng deal? Lots of amazing people have committed suicide, and they turned out alright.
#57
Posted 22 October 2015 - 10:04 PM

And then you go and do this.
>:c
sorry bb. I fix for u
TPG-sponsored MLG tryhard potato recording guide.
Someone whose name rhymes with "ZuneAmanda" being a ragequitting casual.
If the leaderboards aren't real, then how can our MMR be real?
#58
Posted 28 October 2015 - 01:40 AM

Having made experimented with a large number of assorted pizza creations with various permutations of cheese, insta-bread, and sauce, I would like to point out that the selection of bread/crust/dough is crucial to making such things taste as good as they look.
On a note more trenchant to the thread:
Given an arbitrary number of individuals or groups of individuals (both hereafter referred to as "parties") communicating over the internet such that each party believes itself to be in a state of "having a laugh" at the expense of the other (whether by a disparity of emotional investment or intellectual grasp of a subject), how many parties may be simultaneously functionally correct in their belief?
The derivation is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.
the hawken community lets me talk and no where else on the internet has anyone let me do that before so now i know why
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users