Dyson, on October 26 2012 - 05:35 PM, said:
Frankly I don't think any of the loot should be paid for with points or cash or anything. That should be restricted to cosmetic things.
Dyson, on October 26 2012 - 05:35 PM, said:
In a verses game_ I expect a game that is fair to everyone playing it, regardless of the bribes they are willing to pay.
You act like this isn't possible... that some how you can't make money unless you give advantages to those who pay more. And yet Team Fortress 2 is still making money, and Counter Strike is still one of the most played online games. How long do you think some Pay to Win fuzzy bunny is going to last_ A year_ Two before people get bored_ You think people are going to want to pick up the game later on once everyone that is playing it has end-gear and an advantage over them_
Is it too much to ask that skill be the factor_ You preach about working 80 hours a week, well why should that mean you have to pay more to play on even ground_ Why shouldn't YOU be able to get into the game on equal footing with anyone else_
Dyson, on October 26 2012 - 05:35 PM, said:
Then why not just charge $50 for the game and give the game to everyone_ Or use cosmetic items, like TF2_ I've bought things in TF2 before. And I don't regret it... if I wanted to I could drop into it right now and play it, and after having been out of the game for months I'd still be on even footing with the elites and the people who started that day.
This pay structure is a cancer.