Graphics Card Dillemma
#21
Posted October 16 2014 - 10:02 AM
I just hope that this card gives me a good gaming experience. By that I mean very high fps and moderate quality. What do my fellow pilots think__
#22
Posted October 16 2014 - 10:17 AM
CapAllan, on October 16 2014 - 09:39 AM, said:
Apart from that, the GTX 650ti is just waaaayyyy out of my range. I really can't do anything about it! i can't even save up!! I am getting it as a gift and they have asked me for the model. But asking for such an expensive card is way out of my view. I am really sorry. Thanks though!
Using a PCI-E 3.0 compatible card on a 2.0 lane is a non-issue, since you won't be finding newer graphic cards with 2.0 any longer anyways. For single-card setups, the bandwidth provided by 2.0 is more than enough, especially for low-powered cards that do not need extra 6pin+ power.
Don't bother with the 650ti - shoot for the 750. The 650ti has a higher power requirement.
You need to save up for a better setup.
CapAllan, on October 16 2014 - 10:02 AM, said:
I just hope that this card gives me a good gaming experience. By that I mean very high fps and moderate quality. What do my fellow pilots think__
Please, no. Even Intel's integrated HD 4000 graphics outperforms the GT 610.
Edited by xeroslash, October 16 2014 - 10:20 AM.
#23
Posted October 16 2014 - 10:48 AM
I don't have a card yet. So I feel like I should go for this one!
My mother board does not have HD 4000.
#24
Posted October 16 2014 - 10:57 AM
http://www.flipkart....c2-f2f2bccea22f
http://www.flipkart....dd-3da95796b094
http://www.flipkart....dd-3da95796b094
http://www.flipkart....dd-3da95796b094
http://www.flipkart....dd-3da95796b094
Thats it. I can't take other suggestions due to my small budget.
#25
Posted October 16 2014 - 11:01 AM
The GTX 750/750Ti are the best performers you can get with your current limitations. Going lower will help you in the short run, but it'll be a waste of money down the road. A very long time ago, I've been there myself when I had an old Dell with an Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (1.9GHz dual-core) and an onboard GeForce 6150SE. Itching for a short term upgrade, I bought a GeForce 8400GS (pretty much equivalent to how you're considering a GT 610). It was simply $40 down the drain.
Others have mentioned this already, but it's best if you're able to save up for a future build altogether.
#26
Posted October 16 2014 - 11:58 AM
Edited by Silverfire, October 16 2014 - 12:02 PM.
Check out my new short film Prebirth: The Eternal War! Check out my e-peen!
Need to find a mech guide_ Well, look here!
Intel Core i3 2120 @ 3.30 GHz | Corsair XMS3 8GB RAM | eVGA GTX 550Ti 1GB OC | Corsair CX600 PSU
#27
Posted October 16 2014 - 12:36 PM
xeroslash, on October 16 2014 - 11:01 AM, said:
The GTX 750/750Ti are the best performers you can get with your current limitations. Going lower will help you in the short run, but it'll be a waste of money down the road. A very long time ago, I've been there myself when I had an old Dell with an Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (1.9GHz dual-core) and an onboard GeForce 6150SE. Itching for a short term upgrade, I bought a GeForce 8400GS (pretty much equivalent to how you're considering a GT 610). It was simply $40 down the drain.
Others have mentioned this already, but it's best if you're able to save up for a future build altogether.
Silverfire, on October 16 2014 - 11:58 AM, said:
#28
Posted October 16 2014 - 01:03 PM
Edited by JeffMagnum, October 16 2014 - 01:04 PM.
#29
Posted October 17 2014 - 11:09 PM
I play in 800X600 res, textures low, details low, physx off and so on. My game has been modded to get good fps. Still, its bad!
My current specs : https://drive.google...iew_usp=sharing
Here is some of my gameplay : https://drive.google...ekE&usp=sharing
If you look at the video (which is pre-mod), you will see that I have literally no clue about what is happening due to my low fps. The graphics are way lower now due to the mod. I have something like 5 fps more too due to the mod. I shut down everything including windows explorer (I created a .bat file which shuts WE and restarts it after the game crashes.).
i wanted to record some gameplay footage in better quality to upload in my channel. But without a card, that's a distant dream!!
Please recommend from the option given in my OP!
#30
Posted October 18 2014 - 07:52 AM
Edited by Silverfire, October 18 2014 - 07:55 AM.
Check out my new short film Prebirth: The Eternal War! Check out my e-peen!
Need to find a mech guide_ Well, look here!
Intel Core i3 2120 @ 3.30 GHz | Corsair XMS3 8GB RAM | eVGA GTX 550Ti 1GB OC | Corsair CX600 PSU
#31
Posted October 18 2014 - 02:57 PM
Try looking here for a (loosely accurate) chart of how cards stack up to each other.
http://www.tomshardw...iew,3107-7.html
I started out on Hawken on a Radeon 6770 for a while, try starting there for 'almost decent'.
#32
Posted October 19 2014 - 12:51 AM
You have win 7 starter and it can only support 2gb ram and thats it.
You have a 4GB ram stick so it does not work properly with starter. And you said that you ran out of virtual memory, probably because your OS can't use the whole ram you have.
Try to upgrade your OS and see if it stops crashing.
When done with that you might consider a new card.
#33
Posted October 19 2014 - 02:10 AM
FlamingBeaker, on October 18 2014 - 02:57 PM, said:
Try looking here for a (loosely accurate) chart of how cards stack up to each other.
http://www.tomshardw...iew,3107-7.html
I started out on Hawken on a Radeon 6770 for a while, try starting there for 'almost decent'.
A 1 GB 750 should be plenty for Hawken at 60+ FPS on respectable settings. OP, the cards you were looking at use DDR3 memory, which is substantially slower than the GDDR5 in newer cards like the ones being recommended.
I'm not sure how much of a bottleneck his ancient CPU is going to be, though.
#34
Posted October 19 2014 - 07:56 AM
GT 640, 730, or 740 for new, sub $100 cards, but you can still get a used GTX 750 for really cheap too.
Check out my new short film Prebirth: The Eternal War! Check out my e-peen!
Need to find a mech guide_ Well, look here!
Intel Core i3 2120 @ 3.30 GHz | Corsair XMS3 8GB RAM | eVGA GTX 550Ti 1GB OC | Corsair CX600 PSU
#36
Posted October 19 2014 - 01:08 PM
CapAllan, on October 19 2014 - 12:36 PM, said:
You shouldn't need to change your PSU when you put in the GT 730...
Check out my new short film Prebirth: The Eternal War! Check out my e-peen!
Need to find a mech guide_ Well, look here!
Intel Core i3 2120 @ 3.30 GHz | Corsair XMS3 8GB RAM | eVGA GTX 550Ti 1GB OC | Corsair CX600 PSU
#37
Posted October 19 2014 - 04:34 PM
JeffMagnum, on October 19 2014 - 02:10 AM, said:
FlamingBeaker, on October 18 2014 - 02:57 PM, said:
Try looking here for a (loosely accurate) chart of how cards stack up to each other.
http://www.tomshardw...iew,3107-7.html
I started out on Hawken on a Radeon 6770 for a while, try starting there for 'almost decent'.
A 1 GB 750 should be plenty for Hawken at 60+ FPS on respectable settings. OP, the cards you were looking at use DDR3 memory, which is substantially slower than the GDDR5 in newer cards like the ones being recommended.
I'm not sure how much of a bottleneck his ancient CPU is going to be, though.
Same site, different chart:
http://www.tomshardw...ock,3106-5.html
If the original poster's G630 is really about equal to a Q6600, I will personally vouch that stepping up to an i5 is like an order of magnitude better. Even with my Q6600 overclocked to 3.0 ghz, going to an i5-2500 i went from 25-30fps avg to 50-60 fps on the same video card (Radeon 6770). The processor **DEFINITELY** was a bottleneck, more than the video card. I was in denial for a few months, overclocking, upgrading video cards, etc. I'm glad I made the plunge, and what I thought was game lag is now gone.
If the OP can afford even a low-end i3 it is well worth it, and not just for Hawken, either.
#38
Posted October 20 2014 - 12:44 AM
Hawken is using a relatively heavy engine (at least for a low budget gamers like me). i'm on Phenom2 quadcore 3ghz, 6gb ram and 1gb GTS250 OCed aaand still cant run Ultra. its running but not to good. so i play it save and keep it at medium for smooth fps.
#39
Posted October 20 2014 - 03:36 AM
- CPU: 2 GHz Dual Core
- Memory: 3 GB RAM
- Graphics Card: 512 MB Graphics Card supporting DirectX 9.0c and Shader Model 3.0
- Examples: nVidia 9800 GTX or AMD HD 5670
- Operating System: Windows XP or later
- Hard Drive: 5 GB of free space
- Internet Connection: Broadband
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You will probably have less crashes (if any) if you upgrade the operating system, and it will run smoother.
It is the RAM in this case that matters for the game, since it is the RAM that bottlenecks it.
#40
Posted October 20 2014 - 10:20 AM
@Silverfire : My PSU's peak output is 300W. The card needs 300W in itself. So, yes. I have to upgrade.
@Alvizzei : Currently, this is the only way to get a card. I don't have one and I currently play on my onboard graphics.
@FlamingBeaker : Thanks mate! I am not really sure about getting a used card (especially online) as i don't really know what condition it is in. Plus, the people who are getting me the card don't like the entire idea of "Second-Hand". But yeah. I get your point.
I think I've made my choice. I need to find the perfect PSU now. I have a 450W one in mind. Any cheap suggestions_ It has to fit in my cabinet.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users