Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
If there will be a "KING of the arrogant forum warriors" selection, I will vote for you.
You do understand that continuing to say the same fuzzy bunny over and over again brings the conversation nowhere right_ You mention egos, but you were the first to bring into question the skill/player experience of everyone in HAB
Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
I already can imagine what kind of test you were making if you even don't agree with the automatic weapon info.
You mean empirical testing involving checking and double checking values as they stand within the game_
Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
The conclusion based on the OdintheArrogant post were written in my first reply.
No i'm just confirming how adequate and sane is Beeman and the CORE.
Your response to Odin was not limited to Odin, so I called you out on it. You then DENIED that you had said anything about the ENTIRETY of the HAB group, and you and hotdog both LIED about previous statements
Can we stop bullshitting yet_
Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
Why you exaggerate_ Damn i guess its really hard to see things from your's ego altitude, ill try one more time:
When you say that 80% of HAB are forum warriors and question their experience in the game at all, most/all is not an exaggeration. Try making less obviously ridiculous statements next time instead
Quote
Glad to hear that a few had experience in testing, and I hope when you say "testing since alpha" you mean testing since alpha not playing since alpha.
This does not actually contradict your previous sweeping statements. A few could be anywhere from 1% to 20%. You have still been making baseless assertions both concerning the backgrounds of most of the HAB members (without even knowing who is involved) and the reasons why they were chosen
Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
I guess you have your own reality.
If your opinion is that everyone who posts on the forums is unable to kill you in a fair fight in game, and I can point out a number of people who have utterly destroyed you in fair fights, then calling your statement an opinion doesn't do anything. In this case, you've made statements regarding the experience of HAB participants, the selection process, and a number of other things that you honestly can't back up. There's no proof behind anything you've sad whatsoever, and blatant proof to the contrary. Stating that you were just expressing an opinion is ignorant and ineffectual
Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
Yes you are, look:
It's worth noting©
That also has nothing to do with what was being discussed. Did you mean to put something else in there_
Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
Just because all of them are GAMES it doesn't mean that their DEVELOPMENT processes fit to each other.
Again, if you can't understand why other development processes following much the same pattern Hawken has (and several of my given examples are also shooters) in regards to this program are comparable, then there's no point in discussing HAB with you.
Hrono, on July 31 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
So how many of you have testing experience_ And what do you understand by game testing_
I'm just curious .
I cannot speak for absolutely everyone in HAB, nor, again, do I know exactly the criteria that ADH utilizes. However, that's the difference between our arguments. I argue based on what I know to be true, you instead argue based on how emotionally invested you become in something and make blatantly incorrect statements/statements you can't possibly back up
The onus ultimately is on you to bring backing to your statements, or they're just mindless trash talk