HAWKEN servers are up and our latest minor update is live!
Forgot Password_ SUPPORT REDEEM CODE

Jump to content


PSA: The HC Grind


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
201 replies to this topic

#181 Nept

Nept

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,336 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 12:13 AM

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 11:56 PM, said:

View PostNept, on March 03 2014 - 11:42 PM, said:

Again, not about ego.  You're just talking the talk without walking the walk (plain and simple).  If you're going to comment on high-level play using your experience and abilities as a base, you need to be able to provide evidence through your in-game activities.  And it's odd that you use the 'not worth my time' excuse when you can't seem to stop posting.  If you spent one twentieth the time playing that you do posting, I would've seen you in-game by now.
I wouldn't even be able to get into a match if we're going off of weekly posting
Fact of the matter is that the walk has been walked, both by myself and by the members who continue to play. Your insistence that it hasn't flies in the face of the actual facts. I'm just sticking around because this is kinda fun in a GA-forums sorta way

On another note, it's really lame that ADH hates callout threads so much (when they dont pertain to aimbotters that is)
They're actually pretty fun if done well. Back and forth trashtalk is not only entertaining, and actually not at all unhealthy in moderation, but is also vastly preferable to this passive aggressive smug fuzzy bunny
Honestly, noone's being passive-aggressive with you at the moment.  In fact, we're being quite patient.  You may feel that you've walked the walk, so to speak, but we do not.  Neither opinion is a matter of fact.  However, when you're attempting to convince the forums of your expertise, it's worthwhile taking into account their opinions of your ability.  You may certainly continue touting the "nothing left to prove" line, but whether your opinions are well-received depends entirely on your reputation with the player base and with the development team.  I don't think your reputation with either is particularly stellar.

Speaking for my team (Myself, Leonhardt, OmniStone/Restoned, hestoned, MagicalPancake, OmniFilt3r, 7r1p, etc.), I can tell you that noone considers your opinion to be adequately backed by your abilities.  I imagine Xacius' team will report similar results.  And again, you can state that you don't care, or that we're not good players ourselves.  That's fine.  However, please recognize that your experience- and ability-based opinions aren't perceived as being firmly anchored.

*Edit* I believe that I've sent you our vent information before_  I'll be awake for awhile writing a paper.  You are more than welcome to hop on and chat if you're looking for direct conversation.
*Edit 2* Had apparently sent it to AJK before, but not to you.  Included you in that conversation for the info.

Edited by Nept, March 04 2014 - 12:21 AM.

https://robertsspace...orgs/OMNISCIENT


Complaining about Hawken's population_  Read this: https://community.pl...en/#entry524454

Posted Image   


#182 Xacius

Xacius

    The Saltan

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,889 posts
  • LocationOther games, waiting for dev beacon

Posted March 04 2014 - 12:16 AM

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 11:56 PM, said:

View PostXacius, on March 03 2014 - 11:37 PM, said:

Third: Top tier play back then was nothing compared to current top-tier play, partly because the meta has shifted considerably, but also because the top players have improved substantially over time.  
No Xacius, they just left. You did alright back then, but you weren't at the cap. I wouldn't doubt that you hit it, but it was pretty much after every relevant clan/player left. It's nice that the scrim group has basically slowly built itself back up again, but there's still an awful lot of BSB vs BSB fuzzy bunny going on, which was something I was concerned about even when there were several other viable clans around
I really hope you don't think there's anywhere for you to go at this point. Knowing the optimal combos, having a decently organized team and being used to Hawken's ass-backwards aiming system are pretty much all its ever taken. Movement and resource management have varied, but have ultimately been in a poorer state than in Alpha.

I've been regarded as a pretty good player since I started streaming the game in 2012.  Hawken was the first computer-based FPS that I actually played for more than 40 hours. Not a big deal to some veterans of this community, especially not those that have been playing twitch-based PC fps for years, but I've done well enough to be proclaimed as "the best player in the game" by many other players.  But this isn't about me. We already know where each other stands on the topic of one-another's skill.  We also know where other players stand with regards to these perceptions:

Spoiler

You claim that you have nothing left to prove with regards to your personal gameplay, but according to the majority of the populous you never proved anything in the first place.  In fact, the only thing that you have proved is how unnecessarily rude and uninviting you can be on an online forum.

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 11:56 PM, said:

On another note, it's really lame that ADH hates callout threads so much (when they dont pertain to aimbotters that is)
They're actually pretty fun if done well. Back and forth trashtalk is not only entertaining, and actually not at all unhealthy in moderation, but is also vastly preferable to this passive aggressive smug fuzzy bunny

Here you're confirming that you find trash-talk entertaining and largely prefer it to the current communication on these forums (which you've labeled as "passive aggressive").  This is unsettling.  Having personally spoken with you on multiple occasions in your mumble, I can state with confidence that you're capable of having rational discussion.  Nearly all of our conversations have been both entertaining and enjoyable.  On the forums, however, it's like you're an entirely different person.  Before, I didn't really understand your behavior.  After that statement, it all made sense.  

Though it still doesn't explain the discontinuity between your more personal behavior and your behavior on these boards.

Edited by Xacius, March 04 2014 - 03:07 AM.

High MMR (2700+) livestream (scroll down on twitch page for in-depth bio and PC specs).   Check out my Steam Guide!

Exeon is fuzzy bunny bad.

Currently inactive.  Estimated return: TPG 2

#183 Nept

Nept

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,336 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 12:36 AM

View PostXacius, on March 04 2014 - 12:16 AM, said:

You claim that you have nothing left to prove with regards to your personal gameplay, but according to the majority of the populous you never proved anything in the first place.  In fact, the only thing that you have proved is how unnecessarily rude and uninviting you can be on an online forum.

Beeman said:

If you`re going to be buttblasted because I don`t think a causal shooter is worth my time, well... that just makes this whole thing even better
[emphasis mine]

Beeman said:

I'm just sticking around because this is kinda fun in a GA-forums sorta way
Ultimately, we seem to be speaking with someone who doesn't think the game is worth their time, and who's sticking around to cause forum drama.  I don't think drama's the end of the world either, Beeman, but your statements don't provide much confidence re: your intentions.

https://robertsspace...orgs/OMNISCIENT


Complaining about Hawken's population_  Read this: https://community.pl...en/#entry524454

Posted Image   


#184 Mergaz

Mergaz

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 138 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 02:51 AM

The point is: this game in terms of speed is closer to being a new eXteel, Quake or UT3 than ever before. Now it really is doing to be successful_ It is worth spending time and money on a game that even after the released steam barely pass 1k-2k players online_ Devs possibly heard requests for higher level players to make the game as they wanted, but they forgot that these players came from other games failed for lack of players (quake, UT3, Exteel, etc.). Now it's up to assess whether adh worth listening to this kind of players who want to recreate the games that were abandoned or whether they will actually make a game that can attract tens of thousands or even millions of players. Devs will have to choose whether to keep the current gameplay and embitter low numbers of players or will really change the game for something that can attract very much more players and mostly keep them to get a regular player base.

Edited by Mergaz, March 04 2014 - 03:07 AM.


#185 hendman

hendman

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,901 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 02:57 AM

View PostXacius, on March 03 2014 - 11:37 PM, said:

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 10:23 PM, said:

View PostNept, on March 03 2014 - 10:07 PM, said:

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 09:53 PM, said:

*Snip

Honestly, I think you need to prove to the entire community that you and your friends are strong players before spouting off about high-tier play.  You can't continue to claim knowledge without having demonstrated any in-game ability.  And that's not a personal attack.  If you're going to continue to claim experience with high-tier play, you're going to have to demonstrate that high-tier play.  Pretty simple stuff.

As for the rest, it's still massive speculation.  Speculating about it more doesn't make it less speculative.
Right, so the times SK won, placed second or third on a whim, etc. don`t count because we haven`t played the forum popularity contest. I`m not going to play this pointless little game where the goalposts constantly shift to preserve your ego. You can keep hitting massive hitboxes with hitscan weapons and if that`s all a competitive game needs to be for you, more power to ya

First: Red Herring fallacy.  This has nothing to do with ego.  

Second: I think you're avoiding the point.   The gameplay has changed considerably since the early months of 2013.  Assuming they've stopped playing the game, the top players back then wouldn't stand a chance against the top players now.  At that, some of the players that played in those days are still around, and most have improved substantially in the past year.  Old "top players" have returned intermittently, only to be trounced by top members of the active playerbase.  

Third: Top tier play back then was nothing compared to current top-tier play, partly because the meta has shifted considerably, but also because the top players have improved substantially over time.  

If you think the current gameplay is so great, then why do you have these rules: http://www.tpgleague...wk/rules/#2.3.1 for the league you are organizing_

On a side note, I find it strange that apparently only the people who can play this game at top level are allowed to have valid opinions about the game mechanics. By this reasoning even the dev team should not be allowed to take any decisions about the game :wacko: :blink: :unsure:

#186 Nue7ra1

Nue7ra1

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 04:01 AM

View Posthendman, on March 04 2014 - 02:57 AM, said:

On a side note, I find it strange that apparently only the people who can play this game at top level are allowed to have valid opinions about the game mechanics. By this reasoning even the dev team should not be allowed to take any decisions about the game :wacko: :blink: :unsure:
I find it interesting that MWO fell to that, It sometimes seemed like PGI was playing an entirely different game than what they had on the client side.

#187 Rei

Rei

    Hammertime!

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,235 posts
  • LocationMore like... HammeredTime

Posted March 04 2014 - 06:15 AM

View Posthendman, on March 04 2014 - 02:57 AM, said:

View PostXacius, on March 03 2014 - 11:37 PM, said:

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 10:23 PM, said:

View PostNept, on March 03 2014 - 10:07 PM, said:

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 09:53 PM, said:

*Snip

Honestly, I think you need to prove to the entire community that you and your friends are strong players before spouting off about high-tier play.  You can't continue to claim knowledge without having demonstrated any in-game ability.  And that's not a personal attack.  If you're going to continue to claim experience with high-tier play, you're going to have to demonstrate that high-tier play.  Pretty simple stuff.

As for the rest, it's still massive speculation.  Speculating about it more doesn't make it less speculative.
Right, so the times SK won, placed second or third on a whim, etc. don`t count because we haven`t played the forum popularity contest. I`m not going to play this pointless little game where the goalposts constantly shift to preserve your ego. You can keep hitting massive hitboxes with hitscan weapons and if that`s all a competitive game needs to be for you, more power to ya

First: Red Herring fallacy.  This has nothing to do with ego.  

Second: I think you're avoiding the point.   The gameplay has changed considerably since the early months of 2013.  Assuming they've stopped playing the game, the top players back then wouldn't stand a chance against the top players now.  At that, some of the players that played in those days are still around, and most have improved substantially in the past year.  Old "top players" have returned intermittently, only to be trounced by top members of the active playerbase.  

Third: Top tier play back then was nothing compared to current top-tier play, partly because the meta has shifted considerably, but also because the top players have improved substantially over time.  

If you think the current gameplay is so great, then why do you have these rules: http://www.tpgleague...wk/rules/#2.3.1 for the league you are organizing_

On a side note, I find it strange that apparently only the people who can play this game at top level are allowed to have valid opinions about the game mechanics. By this reasoning even the dev team should not be allowed to take any decisions about the game :wacko: :blink: :unsure:
That wasn't the point of the post. It was that top players a year ago wouldn't stand a chance against top players now since the game has changed so much. And that a lot of people don't trust his opinion because he doesn't play this game anymore because a "causal shooter is worth [his] time"
!HAMMERTIME
~「TWITTER」~「STREAM」~「STREAMING GUIDE」~ Sharpshooter is fair and balanced
Posted Image

#188 Superkamikazee

Superkamikazee

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 849 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 06:52 AM

View PostJerk, on March 03 2014 - 10:01 PM, said:

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 08:39 PM, said:

Mech-UT

I'm cool with that.

MWO was fun, but Hawken is a lot more fun.

Pity that both are crippled by terrible F2P and other issues, but in terms of core gameplay Hawken is solid.

Truer words have not been spoken.

#189 Beemann

Beemann

    Sentient Wall-of-Text

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,974 posts
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted March 04 2014 - 06:54 AM

View PostNept, on March 04 2014 - 12:13 AM, said:

Honestly, noone's being passive-aggressive with you at the moment.  In fact, we're being quite patient.  You may feel that you've walked the walk, so to speak, but we do not.  Neither opinion is a matter of fact.  However, when you're attempting to convince the forums of your expertise, it's worthwhile taking into account their opinions of your ability.  You may certainly continue touting the "nothing left to prove" line, but whether your opinions are well-received depends entirely on your reputation with the player base and with the development team.  I don't think your reputation with either is particularly stellar.
Actually you were the one who brought epeens into account. I've argued from a position of things that are tested and proven within the gaming space, and I did so even when my clan was dominating.
The primary issue is that most of these core problems with the game, problems that we saw a year ago, are still largely unfixed. There's a few attempts, certainly, but the same ceiling-lowering elephants are most definitely in the room. This is why people like Zeshi, Zilla, Decoy, Soshmoru etc. stopped playing. The game is not particularly fun once you start to get squished up against the skill ceiling, and people have better methods of spending their time.

As for passive aggression, I've seen the kinds of statements you make in general, and understand the overall tone behind your posts. If you'd at least have the decency to not BS me that'd be great. Not to mention that statements like "actually we're being quite patient with you" are patronizing as fuzzy bunny

View PostNept, on March 04 2014 - 12:13 AM, said:

*Edit* I believe that I've sent you our vent information before_  I'll be awake for awhile writing a paper.  You are more than welcome to hop on and chat if you're looking for direct conversation.
*Edit 2* Had apparently sent it to AJK before, but not to you.  Included you in that conversation for the info.
I went to sleep shortly after that post, not that I'm going to download vent. Our mumble info is freely available, and I can even go so far as to ensure that other people don't hop in the channel if you're planning on pulling the "don't gang up on me" complaint

View PostXacius, on March 04 2014 - 12:16 AM, said:

I've been regarded as a pretty good player since I started streaming the game in 2012.  Hawken was the first computer-based FPS that I actually played for more than 40 hours. Not a big deal to some veterans of this community, especially not those that have been playing twitch-based PC fps for years, but I've done well enough to be proclaimed as "the best player in the game" by many other players.  But this isn't about me. We already know where each other stands on the topic of one-another's skill.  We also know where other players stand with regards to these perceptions:
You've been a popular streamer with people who play the game casually dude. They see someone dominating and pubstomping (something I'm sure you can admit to doing a lot back then) and think "wow, this guy must be the best"
Again, you did fine, but there was a substantial list of people who did better
You also fail to recognize that only recently has this discussion just been about me. The goalposts are steadily shifting because you and I both know that my information doesn't just come from my own gameplay experience, but is a combination of several different sources

View PostXacius, on March 04 2014 - 12:16 AM, said:

Can confirm by the entirety of the BSB.
Because BSB hasn't ever had a biased outlook on skill levels in the game. Nope, not once

View PostXacius, on March 04 2014 - 12:16 AM, said:

You claim that you have nothing left to prove with regards to your personal gameplay, but according to the majority of the populous you never proved anything in the first place.  In fact, the only thing that you have proved is how unnecessarily rude and uninviting you can be on an online forum.
This is hilarious coming from a clan whose members have harassed people in IRC, and from someone who has personally insulted my clan members and then *recorded it* on his own stream.

View PostXacius, on March 04 2014 - 12:16 AM, said:

Here you're confirming that you find trash-talk entertaining and largely prefer it to the current communication on these forums (which you've labeled as "passive aggressive").  This is unsettling.  Having personally spoken with you on multiple occasions in your mumble, I can state with confidence that you're capable of having rational discussion.  Nearly all of our conversations have been both entertaining and enjoyable.  On the forums, however, it's like you're an entirely different person.  Before, I didn't really understand your behavior.  After that statement, it all made sense.  
Xacius, the issue is that while you're in the mumble you're willing to listen to posts, stop for a moment and think about things. Once there's the disconnect of no longer communicating through VOIP, it's like talking to a goddamned brick wall. Your ego gets in the way, and has on more than one occasion
I also know that your current statements don't match up to things you've said to other people. When you gossip, your statements tend to spread, and I hear most of those statements in the end.

Re: Trashtalk
Honestly, it's a factor that every game/sport/whatever has time and space for, it's just a matter of how repressed it is overall. The fact of the matter is that it's superior to littering every post with passive aggressive bs and epeening while talking about someone behind their back.
Not to mention the fact that it allows its own set of factors that can cause something of a story to emerge between games. Check out Starcraft's scene and all the stories that emerge from there solely because of out-of-game banter/trashtalk/etc

It's also something that I'd format entirely differently from this thread. I'd link to examples on the GA forums, but HiRez moved to Reddit

View PostRei, on March 04 2014 - 06:15 AM, said:

That wasn't the point of the post. It was that top players a year ago wouldn't stand a chance against top players now since the game has changed so much. And that a lot of people don't trust his opinion because he doesn't play this game anymore because a "causal shooter is worth [his] time"
No Rei, it's a redirect. Ultimately Nept and Xacius are pulling the same sort of thing people pulled on the Firefall forums a year ago
"I can't argue with your point directly, so I'll attack your credibility overall"
When Nept had no real argument to make, he fell back on the "well we're better" argument. The admission that the game has changed, and the implication that people would lose for that particular reason is an instance of back-pedalling. This tactic has been used in previous threads to attempt to downplay the skill level of the people who quit this game. This was also used to shift goalposts, though both Xacius and Nept continue to say things like "never been proven" even though that hasn't even remotely been the case, and switching between talking about me specifically, and every former member of my old clan.
If it hasn't become immediately obvious that this is a series of epeen fueled personal attacks to compensate for a lack of appropriate counterarguments, I don't know what to say to you.
The issue being that this will cause posters like hendmen to question the forum dynamic like he has
Posted Image

C-Class Swagger
Ballin' and Brawlin'
Cloakin' and Smokin'

#190 MoltenGorilla

MoltenGorilla

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 77 posts
  • LocationMichigan

Posted March 04 2014 - 06:58 AM

This thread:
Posted Image
ACVD Bad Monkeys

#191 Superkamikazee

Superkamikazee

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 849 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 07:09 AM

I hope top tier players understand that this game isn't just about them.

#192 Aregon

Aregon

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,349 posts
  • LocationDistrict 19, Kobalt, Crion, Illal

Posted March 04 2014 - 07:10 AM

Can`t we all just be friends until my voice stops turning mics into gold_

And can we all agree that we are here on the forums, which we all are_



I miss when we all used to be friends here.
I`ll fix it later.

#193 Nept

Nept

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,336 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 07:23 AM

View PostBeemann, on March 04 2014 - 06:54 AM, said:

If it hasn't become immediately obvious that this is a series of epeen fueled personal attacks to compensate for a lack of appropriate counterarguments, I don't know what to say to you.

You're arguing that you've experience with high-tier play from ages ago:

View PostBeemann, on March 04 2014 - 06:54 AM, said:

I also don't think you understand. High level play was hit, ages ago

That is an argument based in expertise.  There are two main issues with that argument.

1) To uphold an argument based in expertise, you have to demonstrate expertise.  In our opinion, you have not demonstrated expertise.  You keep dragging the red herring of egos and epeen, but expert opinion is based entirely on a person's demonstrable expertise.

2) Gaming communities improve.  People get better, and top players from "ages ago" aren't necessarily top players in the current game.  That is true across all games, but it is especially true in a game like Hawken where there have been several sweeping changes to pacing and balance since you've played.  Even if you had demonstrated expertise during the time you were active (which, we maintain, you hadn't), it wouldn't necessarily be applicable to today's community.

*Edit* I find it ironic that you keep talking about shifting goalposts.  You're speaking as though we're artificially shifting goalposts to keep your expertise from being recognized.  The truth, of course, is that goalposts naturally shift as gaming communities improve (not to mention as the game itself changes through patches).  As for charges of passive aggressiveness, well, that's not my intent.  I can understand why you might feel that way given our posting history, but I think most people on this forum would agree that I'm quite direct when I wish to be confrontational.  And again, our vent is always open if you decide that's an issue you wish to pursue.

Edited by Nept, March 04 2014 - 07:31 AM.

https://robertsspace...orgs/OMNISCIENT


Complaining about Hawken's population_  Read this: https://community.pl...en/#entry524454

Posted Image   


#194 Gunmoku

Gunmoku

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 551 posts
  • LocationThe mystical, magical land of Right Over There

Posted March 04 2014 - 07:29 AM

I think it's clear by this point some people just believe that their high horse is too comfortable to get off of and will just accept that their view from on high is the only logical one.

Edited by Gunmoku, March 04 2014 - 07:31 AM.

View PostRED_FIVE, on September 04 2013 - 08:20 PM, said:

YER A RAIDER, HARRY.

#195 Ker4u

Ker4u

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,341 posts
  • LocationLocation Location

Posted March 04 2014 - 07:36 AM

what are they arguing about_

- lok'tar ogar -


#196 Dr_Freeze001

Dr_Freeze001

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 394 posts
  • LocationBelgium, GMT+1

Posted March 04 2014 - 07:42 AM

View PostKer4u, on March 04 2014 - 07:36 AM, said:

what are they arguing about_

Don't ask, just watch.



As an actual answer, I this thread was created to discuss the HC grind, witch then turned into a P2W discussion, and now I think it's about the player tier difference between casual and pro.... I think.

Edited by Dr_Freeze001, March 04 2014 - 07:49 AM.


#197 Gunmoku

Gunmoku

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 551 posts
  • LocationThe mystical, magical land of Right Over There

Posted March 04 2014 - 09:31 AM

View PostDr_Freeze001, on March 04 2014 - 07:42 AM, said:

As an actual answer, I this thread was created to discuss the HC grind, witch then turned into a P2W discussion, and now I think it's about the player tier difference between casual and pro.... I think.

The P2W discussion won't stop until Adhesive adopts a better economic model for this game.  I think that much is clear.

View PostRED_FIVE, on September 04 2013 - 08:20 PM, said:

YER A RAIDER, HARRY.

#198 deidarall

deidarall

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 290 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 09:37 AM

Personally I grinded up my G2 mech from nearly no hc to a full load out. Now I did not do maths or anything, but the steepness of the prices at times could feel odd and unfair.idk did not seem bad to me but I have been around for a while. Hard to say what a new player would think.

Quote


[font=play, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]The P2W discussion won't stop until Adhesive adopts a better economic model for this game.  I think that much is clear. [/font]


Actually I have a feeling that sigma will always be around F2P games. To varying degrees.

Edited by deidarall, March 04 2014 - 09:48 AM.

May the unskilled become the most skilled. May the skilled remain the most skilled. Let the newest players have the most fun, and the most skilled have none. Let the skilled have fun, while the new have none. The unskilled maybe the most skilled if you let them be. The skilled may be the most killed if the world allows that. RAISINS!

Posted Image

#199 Gunmoku

Gunmoku

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 551 posts
  • LocationThe mystical, magical land of Right Over There

Posted March 04 2014 - 10:03 AM

View Postdeidarall, on March 04 2014 - 09:37 AM, said:

Personally I grinded up my G2 mech from nearly no hc to a full load out. Now I did not do maths or anything, but the steepness of the prices at times could feel odd and unfair.idk did not seem bad to me but I have been around for a while. Hard to say what a new player would think.

Quote


The P2W discussion won't stop until Adhesive adopts a better economic model for this game.  I think that much is clear.


Actually I have a feeling that sigma will always be around F2P games. To varying degrees.

No, some games have adopted a completely fair F2P model (see: Loadout, Blacklight Retribution, Path of Exile) and nobody hardly complains about the economic model, stupidly or otherwise.  The reason why we're seeing it here is because there's a much larger grindy wall ahead of new players when they want to unlock multiple mechs with an appropriate loadout.

View PostRED_FIVE, on September 04 2013 - 08:20 PM, said:

YER A RAIDER, HARRY.

#200 WTFuzzyBunny

WTFuzzyBunny

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 78 posts

Posted March 04 2014 - 10:12 AM

View PostBeemann, on March 03 2014 - 11:56 PM, said:

they just left. You did alright back then, but you weren't at the cap. I wouldn't doubt that you hit it, but it was pretty much after every relevant clan/player left.

"Relevant players" didn't "leave". They became irrelevant.
If you want to be relevant in discussions of competitive Hawken gameplay, play competitive Hawken.
If you want to play internet forum competitively, continue doing what you're doing.

Posted Image




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users