200 replies to this topic

[Mykinius]

AsianJoyKiller, on May 06 2014 - 07:32 PM, said:

zorin1, on May 06 2014 - 04:04 PM, said:

[HWK]ZamboniChaos, on May 05 2014 - 05:12 PM, said:

Fixed.

what was fixed_

Everything has been standardized to glorious Comic Sans, the most noble, refined, and elegant of typefaces.

A more elegant typeface from a more civilized age. Only 90s kids remember!

[The_Silencer]

So, is there any chance of having the special ability of the R-G2 slightly improved at short term_

For example,
by burning a bit less fuel, making the R-G2 to coherently run/boost faster in order to evade/pursue a bit better and subsequently increasing its special ability's cooldown.._

Thanks!

[Houruck]

[Aregon]

Houruck, on May 07 2014 - 04:41 AM, said:

YES.

SO MUCH YES.

[grandreaper]

Houruck, on May 07 2014 - 04:41 AM, said:

WHERE DO I SIGN UP_!

[Bazookagofer]

Houruck, on May 07 2014 - 04:41 AM, said:

Sexy and can kick ass... where do I sign up_

[Timerider]

WarlordZ, on May 01 2014 - 11:11 AM, said:

Sylhiri, on May 01 2014 - 10:52 AM, said:

Timerider, on May 01 2014 - 10:12 AM, said:

Quote

Landing from a ledge or from hovering required a brief second for the Mech to recover. This made the movement feel a bit unresponsive and sluggish, so the recovery time was greatly reduced.

Uh, they're giant f***ing mechs. Aren't they supposed to be sluggish_

How many mechs have you driven lately_

This.  I have to admit, the game has moved beyond even semi-realistic physics.  The landing delay wasn't really doing anything except creating a forced stop in a game that is all about mobility.

...I don't even.
Why not replace the mechs with human character models while we're at it. They're more mobile.
"A forced stop" means you need to actually think ahead about what you're doing. An enormous machine falling 7 stories is probably going to stutter, no reason to make this even less realistic than it already is.
I can't believe people actually want this game to become like every other FPS.

AsianJoyKiller, on May 01 2014 - 11:10 AM, said:

"Mech" does not equal "slow". All it means is that they're pilotable.

Unless they're actually miniature or massless, yes it does. There's a thing called inertia.

[AsianJoyKiller]

Timerider, on May 07 2014 - 07:17 PM, said:

AsianJoyKiller, on May 01 2014 - 11:10 AM, said:

"Mech" does not equal "slow". All it means is that they're pilotable.

Unless they're actually miniature or massless, yes it does. There's a thing called inertia.

Wrong. That's only true if you're assuming all the physics in question work like they do in reality, with only the materials we have in reality.
But this isn't reality. This is science fiction.

[Fuzzy_Bunny]

AsianJoyKiller, on May 05 2014 - 02:02 PM, said:

Fuzzy_Bunny, on May 05 2014 - 12:23 AM, said:

Haha!  But no.  Now isn't that the cheap way to try to save face, to say it was a joke all along.

I don't know what to say dude. It was clearly a joke. Look at all the likes on the original post.
Ask one of those people if they thought I was serious.

Don't get mad and start calling me names just because you didn't get it and now feel foolish.

Of course you don't know what to say, because you can't answer back to my responses and key points.  All you come back to now is it was only a joke.  Pathetic.

No, I'm not feeling foolish, because there was nothing to get (as for it being a "joke" NOW).  I got your attitude just fine, and your earlier replies are a testament to you putting on airs.  The person trying to save face, and not feel foolish, is you.

And to those who say I'm twelve years old.  Really, get a brain.  That's the best you can come up with_  If it's meant to make me feel insulted, don't flatter yourself.

[ThomasterXXL]

... When a heavy mech manages to jump on a light mech from 2 meters or higher, the light mech not only deserves to be crushed, but it would also realistically be destroyed. Well not crushed, but pretty much every moving part would break under the stress. If it didn't, they should be able to shrug off all the explosives in the game.

Whatever.

I think they should just start classifying abilities into certain categories and colour the button(-frames) accordingly!

Brown: Modes (Turret Mode and anything that is a toggle that changes the mech's behaviour or maybe even weapon behaviour)
Green: Backup-Supplies (Emergency weapon coolants and generally stuff that replenishes ressources like fuel or armor)
Red: Weapon-Boosts (Anything that temporarily boosts a weapons performance)
Orange: Mech-Boosts (Well, you get the idea...)
My ideas suck, but you get the idea the idea the idea the idea

At the very least there should be a differentiation between mode-abilities that toggle, abilities that have a cooldown and abilities that use a ressource.

[AsianJoyKiller]

Fuzzy_Bunny, on May 08 2014 - 12:40 AM, said:

AsianJoyKiller, on May 05 2014 - 02:02 PM, said:

Fuzzy_Bunny, on May 05 2014 - 12:23 AM, said:

Haha!  But no.  Now isn't that the cheap way to try to save face, to say it was a joke all along.

I don't know what to say dude. It was clearly a joke. Look at all the likes on the original post.
Ask one of those people if they thought I was serious.

Don't get mad and start calling me names just because you didn't get it and now feel foolish.

Of course you don't know what to say, because you can't answer back to my responses and key points.  All you come back to now is it was only a joke.  Pathetic.

No, I'm not feeling foolish, because there was nothing to get (as for it being a "joke" NOW).  I got your attitude just fine, and your earlier replies are a testament to you putting on airs.  The person trying to save face, and not feel foolish, is you.

And to those who say I'm twelve years old.  Really, get a brain.  That's the best you can come up with_  If it's meant to make me feel insulted, don't flatter yourself.

Let's use your logic for a second. I should only be allowed to make a criticism of graphical design skill if I show off my portfolio first.

But then why haven't you shown me yours, if you're questioning my design skills_ Using your own logic, I don't have to respond to any point you make until you show me your work, because otherwise you're not qualified to comment.

I demand you show proof you are an equal or superior graphical designer before further criticize my own design skills.
I also demand you show proof you are equal or superior at humor, or a professional comedian before your further criticize my ability to make a joke.

By your very own logic, if you do not prove these things, you cannot make any sort of judgment about what I have said.



And by the way, if you're really not insulted or hurt by what people have said about you, then why are you lashing out and returning the insults in an immature manner_

[Aregon]

Was going to Like AJK`s post, but thanks to AK I got this message:

An error occurred

[font=play, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]

You have reached your quota of positive votes for the day

[/font]

[Fuzzy_Bunny]

AsianJoyKiller, on May 08 2014 - 09:50 AM, said:

Fuzzy_Bunny, on May 08 2014 - 12:40 AM, said:

AsianJoyKiller, on May 05 2014 - 02:02 PM, said:

Fuzzy_Bunny, on May 05 2014 - 12:23 AM, said:

Haha!  But no.  Now isn't that the cheap way to try to save face, to say it was a joke all along.

I don't know what to say dude. It was clearly a joke. Look at all the likes on the original post.
Ask one of those people if they thought I was serious.

Don't get mad and start calling me names just because you didn't get it and now feel foolish.

Of course you don't know what to say, because you can't answer back to my responses and key points.  All you come back to now is it was only a joke.  Pathetic.

No, I'm not feeling foolish, because there was nothing to get (as for it being a "joke" NOW).  I got your attitude just fine, and your earlier replies are a testament to you putting on airs.  The person trying to save face, and not feel foolish, is you.

And to those who say I'm twelve years old.  Really, get a brain.  That's the best you can come up with_  If it's meant to make me feel insulted, don't flatter yourself.

Let's use your logic for a second. I should only be allowed to make a criticism of graphical design skill if I show off my portfolio first.

But then why haven't you shown me yours, if you're questioning my design skills_ Using your own logic, I don't have to respond to any point you make until you show me your work, because otherwise you're not qualified to comment.

I demand you show proof you are an equal or superior graphical designer before further criticize my own design skills.
I also demand you show proof you are equal or superior at humor, or a professional comedian before your further criticize my ability to make a joke.

By your very own logic, if you do not prove these things, you cannot make any sort of judgment about what I have said.



And by the way, if you're really not insulted or hurt by what people have said about you, then why are you lashing out and returning the insults in an immature manner_

Your logic fails you.

You:
"Are there... are there 5 different fonts on a single banner_

This hurts me as a graphic designer..."

Me:
"Let's see your portfolio, and then we'll know if we can take your commentary seriously."

You:
"But then why haven't you shown me yours, if you're questioning my design skills_ Using your own logic, I don't have to respond to any point you make until you show me your work, because otherwise you're not qualified to comment."

It is because I don't claim to be a graphic designer hurt by such a "failing" in design.  So don't misrepresent me, Mr. "Professional", and oh so "logical" person.

Haha!  Just because I respond does not mean I'm insulted.  Responding to them by saying they should get a brain and think up something more creative is just that.  Get a brain and don't think such infantile jabs really do anything.  But this point does not even matter.  You really lack the comprehension to understand... oh wait, too much pride to swallow a bitter pill for your own good.  Good luck with your "logic" in life.  I hope you don't go through life thinking, "AJK is right".  There is a benefit to humility, and that's not making a fool of yourself.  OVER & OUT.  You've wasted enough of my time.   Haha.

[AsianJoyKiller]

Fuzzy_Bunny, on May 08 2014 - 05:21 PM, said:

Your logic fails you.

Uh... About that. That's your logic I'm using.
So you've just admitted that your own logic is faulty.

Quote

It is because I don't claim to be a graphic designer hurt by such a "failing" in design.  So don't misrepresent me, Mr. "Professional", and oh so "logical" person.

Right.
So your logic is stating that if you can't prove your qualifications, then you are not allowed to comment or criticize. And as you've just admitted you are not qualified, that means you are violating your own logic by commenting or criticizing, and are thus a hypocrite.

You've also failed to prove your qualifications as a comedian, so obviously we can't take your assertion that I wasn't joking seriously either. Your blowing holes in your own argument here, because the nature of the logic your using directly contradicts your very actions.

As you yourself said, "Put up, or shut up." And seeing as you've admitted you can't put up, that leaves you only one option.

Quote

I hope you don't go through life thinking, "AJK is right".

Oh, honey...
You don't actually believe I was serious about that too, do you_

[leEEEEE123]

fgfdcasxbnhmyymjhgbfv

[SodoMojo]

I'm not liking grenadier as much anymore, especially with this new ability. I mean seriously, what's the point of having the turret walls on the mech if they aren't even used_ Turret mode ftw.

[SodoMojo]

Kopra, on May 01 2014 - 12:01 AM, said:

I don't like the changes to the Grenadier.

Grenadier's turret mode was already one of the most viable turret modes, other being Vanguard's. +20% damage and +30% radius meant you could pepper anyone out of a chokepoint. Straight out "press F to get a damage bonus" like Berserker's is boring, easy and too powerful for its ease of use. Artillery Turret Mode was good because it had powerful effects but you could also outplay it if your opponent couldn't position him- or herself correctly. Besides, what's the use of the signature back wings now then_ You aren't just going to delete them_

Kopra, on May 01 2014 - 12:01 AM, said:

I don't like the changes to the Grenadier.

Grenadier's turret mode was already one of the most viable turret modes, other being Vanguard's. +20% damage and +30% radius meant you could pepper anyone out of a chokepoint. Straight out "press F to get a damage bonus" like Berserker's is boring, easy and too powerful for its ease of use. Artillery Turret Mode was good because it had powerful effects but you could also outplay it if your opponent couldn't position him- or herself correctly. Besides, what's the use of the signature back wings now then_ You aren't just going to delete them_

[Capt_Scarf]

What next_ G2 bruiser_

[Zulfat]

какого выбрать тяжелого или среднего_
и какого в тяжелом классе и среднем_

[MigSu]

Ok, just a question now talking about updates, patches, etc.

Why the weaponds heat are not individual_ I mean, you just use a weapond (primary) and the heat is in both (secundary too) with not using.

thanks.