Ran out memory video! Exiting...
#41
Posted November 25 2012 - 10:11 AM
no its long but worth the shot
I have had no problem on my amd system at high settings
cheers guyz
I see DeaD HawkeN PilotS and they all are NooBS !
#42
Posted November 25 2012 - 05:34 PM
JuiceBox, on November 25 2012 - 08:10 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 24 2012 - 11:58 PM, said:
JuiceBox, on November 24 2012 - 09:07 PM, said:
Jadz, on November 24 2012 - 07:39 PM, said:
Your running 2gb of ram which is going to be causing you a lot of grief. Minimum these days is 4gb. By upgrading to 4gb I would say most of your issues would go away.
Only using 78% ram at the time it crashed.
Anyway still don't explain why it has to crash like that when other games with better graphics play through fine
HAWKEN STSTEM REQUIREMENTS
CPU/Processor: Intel Celeron E1500 Dual-Core 2.2GHz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+
Video Card Required: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GS / ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB
Minimum RAM (Memory): 2 GB
Hard Drive Space Required: 3 GB
DirectX Version Needed: 9
Did you read my comment on how different games have different requirements_ And those spcs that are listed aren't set in stone yet either.
Sorry but a system with 2gb of ram is going to be very difficult to game on with some of the new games that have high memory usage.. as I have stated this game can use anywhere between 1.3-1.4gb of ram.. you think with only 2gb of ram that your system will be safe_
#43
Posted November 25 2012 - 05:39 PM
Omega22, on November 25 2012 - 10:11 AM, said:
no its long but worth the shot
I have had no problem on my amd system at high settings
cheers guyz
#44
Posted November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM
#45
Posted November 26 2012 - 02:51 AM
virella, on November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:
I was wondering that as well but a gts 450 on an amd quad phenom with 2gb ddr3 is not really low spec
#46
Posted November 26 2012 - 05:35 AM
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
virella, on November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:
I was wondering that as well but a gts 450 on an amd quad phenom with 2gb ddr3 is not really low spec
Actually it is. GTS 450 is not considered a high end card nor is 2gb of ram in this day and age of gaming yet you insist it is. If you don't want to listen to feedback and positive criticism about modern gaming then why do you insist on keep saying these things_
#47
Posted November 26 2012 - 06:07 AM
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
virella, on November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:
I was wondering that as well but a gts 450 on an amd quad phenom with 2gb ddr3 is not really low spec
Actually it is. GTS 450 is not considered a high end card nor is 2gb of ram in this day and age of gaming yet you insist it is. If you don't want to listen to feedback and positive criticism about modern gaming then why do you insist on keep saying these things_
Edit: Giving opinions and facts in forums sometimes hurts poeple....from now on I'll refrain from doing so.
Edited by HellRik, November 26 2012 - 06:46 AM.
#48
Posted November 26 2012 - 06:32 AM
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
virella, on November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:
I was wondering that as well but a gts 450 on an amd quad phenom with 2gb ddr3 is not really low spec
Actually it is. GTS 450 is not considered a high end card nor is 2gb of ram in this day and age of gaming yet you insist it is. If you don't want to listen to feedback and positive criticism about modern gaming then why do you insist on keep saying these things_
#49
Posted November 26 2012 - 06:37 AM
HellRik, on November 26 2012 - 06:07 AM, said:
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
virella, on November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:
I was wondering that as well but a gts 450 on an amd quad phenom with 2gb ddr3 is not really low spec
Actually it is. GTS 450 is not considered a high end card nor is 2gb of ram in this day and age of gaming yet you insist it is. If you don't want to listen to feedback and positive criticism about modern gaming then why do you insist on keep saying these things_
As I own my computer business, unfortunatly a gts450 its considered today entryline for basic gaming and apps.. As for your Phenom if its not the Phenom-II gen its also a old line, not outdated, but isnt considered high specs.
Edited by Jadz, November 26 2012 - 06:53 AM.
#50
Posted November 26 2012 - 06:51 AM
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 06:37 AM, said:
HellRik, on November 26 2012 - 06:07 AM, said:
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
virella, on November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:
I was wondering that as well but a gts 450 on an amd quad phenom with 2gb ddr3 is not really low spec
Actually it is. GTS 450 is not considered a high end card nor is 2gb of ram in this day and age of gaming yet you insist it is. If you don't want to listen to feedback and positive criticism about modern gaming then why do you insist on keep saying these things_
As I own my computer business, unfortunatly a gts450 its considered today entryline for basic gaming and apps.. As for your Phenom if its not the Phenom-II gen its also a old line, not outdated, but isnt considered high specs.
I edit my last post just for you. If you think a GTS450 is all that...feel free to tell anyone thats playing with 20FPS is fun. Minimum requirements does NOT mean having a great experience!! It means able to start/access a game. I wasn't here to take my e-peen out but if you think I said I owned my computer business to show off you are wrong. I have 10 years of online gaming and selling computers background. I neutrally stated that a gts450 IS not a high end card.
Edited by HellRik, November 26 2012 - 06:53 AM.
#51
Posted November 26 2012 - 07:07 AM
HellRik, on November 26 2012 - 06:51 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 06:37 AM, said:
HellRik, on November 26 2012 - 06:07 AM, said:
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
virella, on November 25 2012 - 10:22 PM, said:
I was wondering that as well but a gts 450 on an amd quad phenom with 2gb ddr3 is not really low spec
Actually it is. GTS 450 is not considered a high end card nor is 2gb of ram in this day and age of gaming yet you insist it is. If you don't want to listen to feedback and positive criticism about modern gaming then why do you insist on keep saying these things_
As I own my computer business, unfortunatly a gts450 its considered today entryline for basic gaming and apps.. As for your Phenom if its not the Phenom-II gen its also a old line, not outdated, but isnt considered high specs.
I edit my last post just for you. If you think a GTS450 is all that...feel free to tell anyone thats playing with 20FPS is fun. Minimum requirements does NOT mean having a great experience!! It means able to start/access a game. I wasn't here to take my e-peen out but if you think I said I owned my computer business to show off you are wrong. I have 10 years of online gaming and selling computers background. I neutrally stated that a gts450 IS not a high end card.
Edited by Jadz, November 26 2012 - 07:15 AM.
#52
Posted November 26 2012 - 07:12 AM
Quote
Sure . go buy a Hyunday and pin a 24ft trailer+boat. It will follow you everywhere. Is it suited for that_ NO
From now on, you 'll be arguying with yourself as I am not here for that.
#53
Posted November 26 2012 - 07:17 AM
HellRik, on November 26 2012 - 07:12 AM, said:
Quote
Sure . go buy a Hyunday and pin a 24ft trailer+boat. It will follow you everywhere. Is it suited for that_ NO
From now on, you 'll be arguying with yourself as I am not here for that.
Edited by Jadz, November 26 2012 - 07:18 AM.
#54
Posted November 26 2012 - 07:42 AM
Is there some incompatibilty here with windows 7 32 bit_ I will test this on the same build with windows xp and let you know what happens. Anyone have the link to the official system requirements here on the hawken site_ I am really starting to think maybe they are using a driver or something that is not working on windows 7 32bit anyway I am going to test it on xp same build. If that crashes I will add 2 more gb ram on the xp build and the win7 32 bit build and see what happens. I will post the results tommorrow. Just also recalled a time when a game I was testing worked fine on x64 7 and not 32 bit 7 and it was found out that there anti hacking software was not compatible with win7 32 bit. If interrested the name of the incompatible software with win7 32 bit was I believe hacksheild worked fine on win7 x64 come to find out they intentionally did not even bother to make the software work on win7 32 bit.
Edited by Jadz, November 26 2012 - 07:47 AM.
#55
Posted November 26 2012 - 07:47 AM
This is a beta product which isn't anywhere near finished meaning system specs can change every release they do. Until the game is finalized nobody has a clue what the requirements will be and as stated your system falls into a "was good 5 years ago category"
#56
Posted November 26 2012 - 08:48 AM
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 07:47 AM, said:
This is a beta product which isn't anywhere near finished meaning system specs can change every release they do. Until the game is finalized nobody has a clue what the requirements will be and as stated your system falls into a "was good 5 years ago category"
Well JuiceBox is making more sense then jadz. Ty for stating the obvious. peace
Edited by HellRik, November 26 2012 - 08:50 AM.
#57
Posted November 26 2012 - 11:01 AM
HellRik, on November 26 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 07:47 AM, said:
This is a beta product which isn't anywhere near finished meaning system specs can change every release they do. Until the game is finalized nobody has a clue what the requirements will be and as stated your system falls into a "was good 5 years ago category"
Well JuiceBox is making more sense then jadz. Ty for stating the obvious. peace
#58
Posted November 26 2012 - 11:05 AM
JuiceBox, on November 26 2012 - 07:47 AM, said:
This is a beta product which isn't anywhere near finished meaning system specs can change every release they do. Until the game is finalized nobody has a clue what the requirements will be and as stated your system falls into a "was good 5 years ago category"
Edited by Jadz, November 26 2012 - 11:06 AM.
#59
Posted November 26 2012 - 11:22 AM
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 11:01 AM, said:
lolz
I wonder who's ego is bigger. Trying to insult me_ lmao
This is my 6th day in Hawken and no, its not my favorite game. Did I sound like I was trying to promote the game_
Sorry if my explanation are short and with some grammar mistake as English is my 3rd language.
I'll let you reply on this one with some other insults. I think you need to go chill in a corner or simply leave this forum if you have no intentions of keeping it mature.
Protip#1: next time try to reply in one shot instead of spamming the thread.
Protip#2: Using Toggle editing mode in the post lets you put empty line in your post to make it breath and doesnt look like a fracking -unreadable -wall of text.
Edited by HellRik, November 26 2012 - 11:32 AM.
#60
Posted November 26 2012 - 11:33 AM
HellRik, on November 26 2012 - 11:22 AM, said:
Jadz, on November 26 2012 - 11:01 AM, said:
lolz
I wonder who,s ego is bigger. Trying to insult me_ lmao
This is my 6th day in Hawken and no, its not my favorite game. Did I sound like I was trying to promote the game_
Sorry if my explanation are short and with some grammar mistake as English is my 3rd language.
I'll let you reply on this one with some other insults. I think you need to go chill in a corner or simply leave this forum if you have no intentions of keeping it mature.
Protip: next time try to reply in one shot instead of spamming the thread.
Edited by Jadz, November 26 2012 - 11:39 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users