TheDubstepDisciple said:
Again you assume people have the time and $600 to kick around as they please.
They better work their asses for it. They spent in two damaged 360s and 1 PS3. That sums about 900 dollars in consoles alone without video games.
Sorry but that excuse doesn't work.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
A scaled down PC game as opposed to a fully functional console game that is optimized for the hardware included in a console, for a fraction of that $600 you assume people have to drop. Sorry if you don't sell me there.
A retarded dumb ass moron can come off with a better excuse. Read above. That excuse doesn't hold. People already are in their second ring of death and in their third console. That sums up more than 1,000 dollars.
People don't know how to invest because they are dimwitted and shortsighted. They can't fathom the elementary of investment and research. They are just lame potato couch unable to browse the internet for a modicum computer.
You are trying to troll with lame arguments for the sake of trolling. At least try to work better on your answers.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
Again, you seem to think people have to "match" your dedication to a game or system. Sorry, games don't run my life. My work, family, and life do. Games are something that I use to relax after a 12 hour drag shift. I don't want to be so invested in something I, and many, of us use to relax. This is the bane of having gaming hit mainstream, people who take the games TOO seriously and then shit on the rest of us.
Casuals like you are not interested on quality. Hence you should not be interested in my arguments. However you spent time diluding your hypocritical stance in here. Sorry, but that doesn't add up. You are baiting or trolling foolishly with red herring arguments.
You see, sorry if I'm a bit rude but if you are a casual you simply step aside and let others continue their conversations on video games. If you are not interested in quality, you have every right to do so. However you came off trotting and straddling hypocritically in this conversation pretending as if you once cared for video games.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
Just a chunk of generalized computer elistist mantra here.
The truth hurts. Deal with it.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
If this group is so talented you should support them and encourage them to make the game as good as they possibly can
Dumbo, I'm here for a reason. If I were not interested in their talent then why I'm busy giving a fuck about their decisions_
Try to realize this, I don't enjoy watching sellout cunts dropping their game for brain dead morons. Do you know why_ Because that truncates the quality of the business, the gaming industry and the game itself.
You see, we gamers care for the game. We want the game to be the best and afterwards delimit the plans for the ports. However the game should be a timed exclusive for PC first. Built up the reputation there and then port to the consoles.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
as opposed to limiting it to a very smaller market just so you can claim a victory for PC's.
Trolling.
The business market of PC is much wider than the console market.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
However does putting this game on a console mean its shit_
On a 720 and Ps4 of course not.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
No it means your trying to reach a larger market of people.
More trolling.
Look Unreal III their community and the later port to the PS3 and 360. That was the natural process.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
Ignoring the obvious compatibility issues of differing hardware, like chipset compatibility, motherboard to memory compatibility, video card capability and ensuring adequate power supply,building a computer is by far an easy task. Let alone one that most people working full time have the time and resources, you still assume people have that kind of cash laying around, to complete.
Another trolling argument.
Go buy assembled systems. Is it hard to use the brain_ Is it_
TheDubstepDisciple said:
Dismissing all console gamers will destroy the gaming industry.
Are you special_
You don't dismiss the consoles. You launch when the consoles are with the standards of your games. The PS3 and the 360 are weak consoles. Designing for them is playing back to the future with six years old hardwares.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
Sorry but the mainstream acceptance of gaming as a leisure activity is a direct result of consoles. If you want this game to succeed you should encourage them to branch out to consoles ensuring at least a larger market for their wares to continue to produce very good video games which is what we all want. I can deal with lesser graphics for a fairer price point.
Wrong.
You first perform on PC and then optimize the game for the consoles like the PS4 and 720. Two more years doesn't hurt anybody. Console peasants must learn to wait. They have lots of gimped games to be entertained. They don't need this one.
TheDubstepDisciple said:
I'm not sorry if your blunt cause I will be. This industry is built on consoles. If you want this game limited to computers, so be it.
Are you trying to piss me off with these imbecile arguments written on purpose_ Really, why you try so hard writing words you don't believe_
http://adrianwerner....com/2011-games/
TheDubstepDisciple said:
But it will not enjoy the success it COULD on consoles. Which means less money for the devs, less incentive to make more games. Which is something none of us want.
Porting on consoles could happen later. You don't need to make dumb your initial idea porting to the weak 360 off the bat. Doing that is just shooting yourself in the foot for the wrong reassons. In order to sell you need to built up a Rep. They need to prove themselves on PC and later on convince publishers to finance their job.
Simple.
0
This topic is locked
