_Hex_, on January 18 2013 - 12:01 PM, said:
My only complaint is this. It needed a projectile speed buff or a mine proximity buff. This does nothing imo. Unless it's a DRASTIC decrease in heat generation.
Well, it wasn't a "slightly".
Sylhiri, on January 18 2013 - 11:59 AM, said:
<3
Zeshi, on January 18 2013 - 12:06 PM, said:
Explosions- What does "knockback effect reduced" mean_ Does that mean no more stunlock, smaller stunlock, or actually fixed physics (when explosions hit you in the front they can currently fling you FORWARD).
EMP- Well, guess this is still going to be banned for competitive play. 5.5 sec duration and fixing the aoe are steps in the right direction. But 5.5 secs is still too long, it still goes through walls, its still piss easy to land, it still affects you the same whether you are directly hit or barely hit, and its still the best item by far.
Explosive weapon knockback should no longer "stunlock" a target. As for EMPs, the area-of-effect is intended to penetrate walls.
Cpt_Kill_Jack, on January 18 2013 - 12:40 PM, said:
I wish the Crushing kills would be renamed Goomba kills but I think there is a Copyright issue there. We as the community will still call them goomba stomps.
So will the Boosts properly stack now_
Goomba stomps is kinda awesome. I prefer DFA myself. The boost stacking issue is slated be resolved in a future patch. Sorry about that!
RedVan, on January 18 2013 - 12:43 PM, said:
So, can we get a mario skin for the mechs_ Because I'm gonna be squishing all dem other mechs like little mushrooms.
There's that whole copyright thing...
z121231211, on January 18 2013 - 12:46 PM, said:
100 internets for catching that reference.