Platform Preference
#21
Posted April 22 2011 - 08:23 AM
#22
Posted April 22 2011 - 09:33 AM
#23
Posted April 22 2011 - 10:03 AM
Quote
I could not have said it better my self.
I do hope the devs read and listen to the community that is now growing for this game and I'm sure they will, but honestly not making this a lead PC platform game would harm them (the company) right from the start.
In fact some of the more successful games and development studios that have their roots in PC gaming in the last 10 years (if not more), have stayed true the the PC format. Others (looking at Crytek here) have "stabbed" the PC community in the back, it sounds harsh to say that but its true I personal and many more, if not all the PC community feel this regardless of how the game looks it's sad to see a development studio do this to loyal fans and a loyal community.
I guess in short. Doing the right thing, would be making this a PC game. And having a strong fan base on the PC would only benefit Adhesive Games in these early days of their studio.
#24
Posted April 22 2011 - 12:06 PM
I'd love to see a PS3 release but apparently its harder for it to be ported there. Whatever gets the game out faster_
#25
Posted April 22 2011 - 12:36 PM
Lev_Astov said:
I think that would actually be horrible... It would just end up to be some gimmicky crap.
Come join the Hawken IRC Channel and chat about Hawken: #hawkenscrim on irc.quakenet.net
Yes, I am a wizard - There is no cupcake conspiracy
[03:18:55 pm] <-- ^-^ (webchat@[ip removed]) has quit (Quit: Later All! Also pls ban Kindos7)
#26
Posted April 22 2011 - 01:04 PM
Do you expect a game that looks like this:
Be on a console, are you serious_
#27
Posted April 22 2011 - 01:31 PM
Do you expect me to suddenly shell out at least $200 in new hardware to get my computer up to spec when I've never seriously played a PC game before and already put a lot into Xbox 360_ I'm sorry I'm not a godly PC gamer like you, but not everyone plays games on the computer. Adhesive Games already specified they were looking at doing it for the Xbox 360 and PS3...
Look at it from my point of view: If you had invested all your money into consoles, and that's all you played, would you see yourself suddenly switching over to PC for 1 game_ (A very good game, but still just *a* game.) Or would you find yourself wanting for it to come out on the console you spent your money on_
Yes, consoles have limitations that PC's don't. Yes, the game might look worse on a console than on a PC. And I can clearly see the majority of the people here play games on a PC. But I *like* my console. I didn't come on this forum to defend my position on being a console gamer. I came here to join with the rest of the people here in being a fan of such a great game, no matter what it comes out on.
Come join the Hawken IRC Channel and chat about Hawken: #hawkenscrim on irc.quakenet.net
Yes, I am a wizard - There is no cupcake conspiracy
[03:18:55 pm] <-- ^-^ (webchat@[ip removed]) has quit (Quit: Later All! Also pls ban Kindos7)
#28
Posted April 22 2011 - 01:32 PM
#29
Posted April 22 2011 - 02:08 PM
So I'll be very technical.
Taking this game for the consoles is the same as wrapping the game in a box, buy a fine aluminum baseball bat for few Euros, go to your room and beat the hell out of it for an hour. After that you will take the game back and ship it. The result will be nasty.
The problem with the consoles is the low Ram in them. You have for the PS3 256MB XDR Main RAM at 3.2GHz 256MB GDDR3 VRAM at 700MHz and the 360 a Ram Memory of 512 MB GDDR3 RAM 700 MHz DDR. The consoles are roughly five years old. The team will be forced to do "reverse engineering" trying to fit the game into those old architectures. That imply a reduction on polygons, a reduction on textures, FSAA, no use of Bokeh deph of field, no use of dynamic motion blur and so on.
Consoles are a set back instead of an advancement. From a technical point of view you hinder the development of the game to a status where the main features of the game becomes compromised in order to attain a steady 30 frames per second. All the features like fug, blur, self shadowing, shading simply goes off the boat for a game that demands a high rate of resources.
This is the result of designing an engine for the consoles:
I don't want to start an argument over something that is highly technical and obvious. The consequences are there for example Crysis I and Crysis II. If you compare the Crytek Engine 2 and 3 you will see how much they downgraded in order to run their game on the consoles.
Yes, I want more people to play the game but this game doesn't belong in this generation of consoles. They have to go five years into the past gimping their game for the achievement of a fair frame rate.
I think the game belongs on PC and stay there untill the next generation of consoles arrives. Many people invested a lot on their consoles. That's fine but moving this game into a console is like beating the game with an aluminum bat.
#30
Posted April 22 2011 - 02:09 PM
Ashfire908 said:
On the other hand, remembering the horrible launch of UT3, a multi platform release has to be done right. As a PC player I felt screwed..
#31
Posted April 22 2011 - 02:14 PM
3leggedFreak said:
Ashfire908 said:
On the other hand, remembering the horrible launch of UT3, a multi platform release has to be done right. As a PC player I felt screwed..
Don't worry I'm careful not to start versus debates. However the game is not for the consoles. The development team placed a stamp in the game when the video was shown. It's good to see this game for the next generation of consoles but in this one the game will end up suffering a lot like Crysis II. It's a pain to see great ideas thrown out the window thanks to hardware limitations.
#32
Posted April 22 2011 - 02:33 PM
#33
Posted April 22 2011 - 02:51 PM
TMRNetShark said:
Come join the Hawken IRC Channel and chat about Hawken: #hawkenscrim on irc.quakenet.net
Yes, I am a wizard - There is no cupcake conspiracy
[03:18:55 pm] <-- ^-^ (webchat@[ip removed]) has quit (Quit: Later All! Also pls ban Kindos7)
#34
Posted April 22 2011 - 03:48 PM
Dudes chill with the flaming. Let's all shear our opinions and discuss in a civilized manner.
#35
Posted April 22 2011 - 04:35 PM
#36
Posted April 23 2011 - 07:21 PM
I don't play many games... I just love giant robots!
#37
Posted April 24 2011 - 01:31 PM
#38
Posted April 24 2011 - 05:07 PM
There's no debate between PC and console. PC is always > Console in terms of hardware, considering a console is essentially just a bad PC packaged for cheap. That's where consoles are > PC: They're more accessible to the masses.
So should the game be on both_ Sure, why not. But build it to the higher standard first.
Come hang out on #hawken and #hawkenscrim, http://webchat.quakenet.org/
https://robertsspace...orgs/OMNISCIENT
#39
Posted April 24 2011 - 06:54 PM
So if this game doesnt come out for consoles in at least a reasonable amount of time, like before the initial release purchases die down, than many, MANY gamers will be unsatisfied, which would suck. It is absolutely necessary that this game be released for console ASAP after it is released for pc (if that's the case).
#40
Posted April 24 2011 - 10:46 PM
I have a feeling that just about any cheap out of the box dept. store computer should be able to run it fine.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users