Edited by Loklov_Krein_Rah, March 29 2014 - 10:36 PM.
To the Dev/Hawken Gods: We want to Buff the Predator
#81
Posted March 29 2014 - 10:34 PM
#82
Posted March 29 2014 - 10:36 PM
Zylox, on March 29 2014 - 10:13 PM, said:
Come on people. The thing has a good role to play, but it doesn't play it perfectly. Anyone who is saying anything at all in this game is perfect at this point in development needs a serious wake-up call. The predator, like all things Hawken, is a work in progress, and needs tweaking and balancing in order to bring it into the role it was designed to fill.
Stop bragging and bickering about personal skill and focus on what should be balanced from an objective point of view. If you can't do that, you need a time-out to cool your head.
That's the point I'm making.
And the reason I'm going on about personal skill is because people keep making assertions about problems the Breacher has, that the Breacher doesn't actually have. If it actually had those problems, then I wouldn't be able to do what I do with it. It's not about bragging. It's about getting people to realize where the problem lies isn't with the weapon, but with themselves. It's a valid point to make, because you can't balance a game around doing things wrong.
It's not like the old Alpha version of the EOC, that was so hard to use even the best players in the game couldn't use it effectively. The Breacher is a perfectly viable weapon in the hands of even mid-range MMR players, and is in line with the other primary weapons. If you try using any other primary without using your secondary, then of course you're going to have a bad time. Primaries are not designed to take down mechs by themselves.
The trouble is that, especially for less skilled players, the secondary on the Pred is extremely troublesome to use
If you can't land your shots with that, then you're losing out on a lot of damage. Of course the Breacher isn't going to cut it if you don't have a reliable secondary. But if the EOC-P was more reliable in combat, then the Breacher would be more than adequate.
Despite the fact I'm going on about personal skill, it is about being objective.
It's about not letting your personal performance with the Breacher cloud your judgement of where it sits balance-wise, and take a look at what is causing the problems.
Quite frankly, it's easier for someone who is more skilled and more competent with the weapon to see than it is for someone who isn't. If you can use the Breacher properly, it's easy to see that it's not the problem.
[HWK]HUGHES, on July 03 2013 - 11:07 PM, said:
The Sinful Infil HEAT Cannon Hustler, Cloaking and Smoking, C-Class Swagger, Ballin' n' Brawlin'
#83
Posted March 29 2014 - 10:40 PM
Edited by Onstrava, March 29 2014 - 10:40 PM.
#84
Posted March 30 2014 - 12:11 AM
AsianJoyKiller, on March 29 2014 - 08:15 PM, said:
KylarxS, on March 29 2014 - 07:49 PM, said:
Quote
Besides that, it's not that hard to be accurate with the charged Breacher. I regularly harass snipers into running away using charged shots. It's hitscan and very accurate. Doesn't get much easier than that.
So you're saying you don charge the breacher and head to close combat right_ Then later on you say you can easily out maneuver an A-class using sustained weapons_ Is the sniper you're killing so weak then he rather run then fight head on against you_ lol
Quote
Or because I regularly land direct hit shots with the EOC-P.
If you can regularly land direct shots with EOC-P then you must be really good. Or maybe they don't know how to avoid or fly_ So a bunch of blinking mines on the fall doesn't attract suspicions...
Quote
I'm not.
How often do you manage to hit a dodging scout_ A video for me to watch maybe_ I could learn from you
Quote
Again they could just fly past your mines or if possible the walls/boulders. If you play against someone experience do you think they would stay on the ground often to step on land mines_
#85
Posted March 30 2014 - 12:17 AM
#86
Posted March 30 2014 - 12:18 AM
KylarxS, on March 30 2014 - 12:11 AM, said:
Mines that will never touch the ground, wall, or any surface other than the target mech_
They are somehow going to magically phase through mines that have specifically be calculated to hit them in the torso while they are moving_
Tell me, how do you just "fly past" something that has been timed and aimed so that it hits you directly and you can't do anything about it_
If I'm playing against someone experienced, I'm not going to give them the choice to avoid the mines.
I am shooting the mines directly at them, whether they're in the air or on the ground. I will not use my EOC-P as a trap weapon at that point, I will use it like a direct hit weapon.
[HWK]HUGHES, on July 03 2013 - 11:07 PM, said:
The Sinful Infil HEAT Cannon Hustler, Cloaking and Smoking, C-Class Swagger, Ballin' n' Brawlin'
#87
Posted March 30 2014 - 12:25 AM
Edited by Onstrava, March 30 2014 - 12:41 AM.
#88
Posted March 30 2014 - 01:38 AM
Edited by Onstrava, March 30 2014 - 01:39 AM.
#89
Posted March 30 2014 - 02:05 AM
AsianJoyKiller, on March 30 2014 - 12:18 AM, said:
KylarxS, on March 30 2014 - 12:11 AM, said:
Mines that will never touch the ground, wall, or any surface other than the target mech_
They are somehow going to magically phase through mines that have specifically be calculated to hit them in the torso while they are moving_
Tell me, how do you just "fly past" something that has been timed and aimed so that it hits you directly and you can't do anything about it_
If I'm playing against someone experienced, I'm not going to give them the choice to avoid the mines.
I am shooting the mines directly at them, whether they're in the air or on the ground. I will not use my EOC-P as a trap weapon at that point, I will use it like a direct hit weapon.
So you're saying in the heat of the battle, you, manage to aim so accurately each and every of your shot to hit the enemy body and there won't be anybody else shooting at you from some where else or take account that the opponent will actually fire at you as well. You can basically dodge and shoot slow moving mines at your opponent that you are rather sure would hit most of the time. I would really like to watch a video of you playing if you don't mind.
#90
Posted March 30 2014 - 02:43 AM
Edited by Lightangel112, March 30 2014 - 02:43 AM.
Meraple, on June 01 2014 - 11:54 AM, said:
#91
Posted March 30 2014 - 03:12 AM
KylarxS, on March 30 2014 - 02:05 AM, said:
You sure do make a lot of assumptions.
For the record, I have a 65% accuracy rating wih my Eoc P, which isn't bad when you consider I don't lay as many traps as most preds do.
Here's the main thing, the reason why I probably don't have as much trouble as many people in this thread seem to be having.
I've been playing hawken since alpha, for something near two years. I am intimately familiar with how it works and the common patterns he people use when fighting.
And this means I instinctively know how to fit the predator into that picture. So while I may not have the best aim or the quickest reaction time, when I get into a fight, I know what I need to do to win it. I am aware of all the little things about my own play style, like exactly how over aggressive I am and how I'm very bad against face hugging, which means I am very able to leverage situations to my strengths.
It also means I'm very aware of when things are my fault, and when it's the mechanics that are the problem.
[HWK]HUGHES, on July 03 2013 - 11:07 PM, said:
The Sinful Infil HEAT Cannon Hustler, Cloaking and Smoking, C-Class Swagger, Ballin' n' Brawlin'
#92
Posted March 30 2014 - 03:58 AM
AsianJoyKiller, on March 30 2014 - 03:12 AM, said:
KylarxS, on March 30 2014 - 02:05 AM, said:
You sure do make a lot of assumptions.
For the record, I have a 65% accuracy rating wih my Eoc P, which isn't bad when you consider I don't lay as many traps as most preds do.
Here's the main thing, the reason why I probably don't have as much trouble as many people in this thread seem to be having.
I've been playing hawken since alpha, for something near two years. I am intimately familiar with how it works and the common patterns he people use when fighting.
And this means I instinctively know how to fit the predator into that picture. So while I may not have the best aim or the quickest reaction time, when I get into a fight, I know what I need to do to win it. I am aware of all the little things about my own play style, like exactly how over aggressive I am and how I'm very bad against face hugging, which means I am very able to leverage situations to my strengths.
It also means I'm very aware of when things are my fault, and when it's the mechanics that are the problem.
And you make it sound like you have godly accuracy which is why I would so like to watch how you play.
#93
Posted March 30 2014 - 04:18 AM
KylarxS, on March 30 2014 - 03:58 AM, said:
Secondly, did your read what I wrote_ 65% accuracy.
Even if you made the assumption I always go for direct hits and never lay traps, I don't see how you could ever possibly get "godly" from 65%. It's completely irrational and downright silly.
[HWK]HUGHES, on July 03 2013 - 11:07 PM, said:
The Sinful Infil HEAT Cannon Hustler, Cloaking and Smoking, C-Class Swagger, Ballin' n' Brawlin'
#94
Posted March 30 2014 - 04:31 AM
#95
Posted March 30 2014 - 04:41 AM
AsianJoyKiller, on March 30 2014 - 04:18 AM, said:
KylarxS, on March 30 2014 - 03:58 AM, said:
Secondly, did your read what I wrote_ 65% accuracy.
Even if you made the assumption I always go for direct hits and never lay traps, I don't see how you could ever possibly get "godly" from 65%. It's completely irrational and downright silly.
Quoting from what you said earlier They're going to magically fly past mines aimed to collide directly with their mech_
Mines that will never touch the ground, wall, or any surface other than the target mech_
They are somehow going to magically phase through mines that have specifically be calculated to hit them in the torso while they are moving_ You say it like you have some godly accuracy which is why i said that.
Onstrava, on March 30 2014 - 04:31 AM, said:
My apologies :3
#96
Posted March 30 2014 - 04:53 AM
Edited by Loklov_Krein_Rah, March 30 2014 - 04:55 AM.
#97
Posted March 30 2014 - 05:16 AM
A lot of times the airborne mechs are also shooting at you and I find it hard to win a DPS race against Beserkers/Assault or even Rocketeer. When you get a chance can you post a youtube video_
I feel I'd learn a lot watching from your perspective. If your system is no longer able to handle it, add me to an ingame friend, and I can record playing as the Beserker.
[font=play, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]We are always looking to recruit new members. If you are interested in joining a great team and experiencing tactical play at its very best, fill out the [/font]application[font=play, helvetica, arial, sans-serif] on our website now. One of our dedicated staff will be in touch very soon after your application is received but if you have any questions please feel free to drop me a PM. We use Teamspeak3 to communicate on our own secure and professionally maintained servers. [/font]
#98
Posted March 30 2014 - 05:21 AM
DFTR, on March 30 2014 - 05:16 AM, said:
A lot of times the airborne mechs are also shooting at you and I find it hard to win a DPS race against Beserkers/Assault or even Rocketeer. When you get a chance can you post a youtube video_
I feel I'd learn a lot watching from your perspective. If your system is no longer able to handle it, add me to an ingame friend, and I can record playing as the Beserker.
I actually find that I have better chance against C-rank mechs since they can't really dodge and easier to backstab them most of the times :3
#99
Posted March 30 2014 - 05:58 AM
DFTR, on March 30 2014 - 05:16 AM, said:
A lot of times the airborne mechs are also shooting at you and I find it hard to win a DPS race against Beserkers/Assault or even Rocketeer. When you get a chance can you post a youtube video_
I feel I'd learn a lot watching from your perspective. If your system is no longer able to handle it, add me to an ingame friend, and I can record playing as the Beserker.
It can help to dive behind cover against flying mechs, limited fuel means they can't stay up for long. Also flying means either eating a TOW rocket or AC-dodging(that burns lots of fuel).
Someone elses data of Hawken gear/mechs | and another one
#100
Posted March 30 2014 - 06:14 AM
Stingz, on March 30 2014 - 05:58 AM, said:
DFTR, on March 30 2014 - 05:16 AM, said:
A lot of times the airborne mechs are also shooting at you and I find it hard to win a DPS race against Beserkers/Assault or even Rocketeer. When you get a chance can you post a youtube video_
I feel I'd learn a lot watching from your perspective. If your system is no longer able to handle it, add me to an ingame friend, and I can record playing as the Beserker.
It can help to dive behind cover against flying mechs, limited fuel means they can't stay up for long. Also flying means either eating a TOW rocket or AC-dodging(that burns lots of fuel).
We predators don't have a TOW rocket and some smaller obstacles can be flied over.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users