50 replies to this topic

[MechFighter5e3bf9]

6v6 was the perfect balance infact, they sacraficed their own bodies to make it balanced which is why new owners so dont tarnish their legacy

[nepacaka]

Than Less players play, than higher skill you need to win. Someone above suggest 3vs3, I think it is can be a perfect game mode too, but tech is completely broken in 3vs3, and some mech combination is OP. So, 5vs5 is optimal variant to try.
They can make stupid 16vs16 servers, why not try create several with 5v5?

[Pleasure_Mortar]

I think Hawken should be more 8 vs 8 or even 10 vs 10 and implement some larger maps.

Why? I hate those small teams. Making a mistake or having a weaker player has so much more impact in small team plus I think it's more fun with more people.

[nepacaka]

Large map is not fun for C-class. It's only fan for suicide raider, when player die and jump in fight again after 5 sec.
Even on fuzzy bunny lostEco brawler spent 30 sec. or more to travel through map in TDM, DM. And it is obvious c-class can't play on this map comfortable. So, big map are stupid. 6 players team can kill brawler in 1.5 sec if use focus-fire, so team with 10 players can kill C's less than second. Scout die less than 0.2 sec, if all team shoot in he from AR. No tactics here, only stupid spam. I don't see nothing fun in here.
Early we have MA mode with 12vs12. It is always be a stupid zerg rush. Kill, die, repeat, etc.

[nepacaka]

Also, c-class can have x2 more problem due his speed, because if you use dodge and evade 1 attack, in next 1.4 second you take damage from 4-5 enemies. It is equal instant death. C-class can't tanking against 10 enemies even with 2 tech (so, they lose their main role in game). And should always use cover, because higher HP not save you against 7-10 weapons. Walking on open space = instant death. Less place for maneuver, even if you cover from several enemies, other enemies probably see you. So, bigger map have a sense only if A,B, and C classes will have equal boost speed, but different acceleration. I.e. A class have maximal speed after 2 seconds, b - after 3 sec., c - after 4 sec.

Edited by nepacaka, 01 September 2015 - 04:25 AM.

[PoopSlinger]

Than Less players play, than higher skill you need to win. Someone above suggest 3vs3, I think it is can be a perfect game mode too, but tech is completely broken in 3vs3, and some mech combination is OP. So, 5vs5 is optimal variant to try.
They can make stupid 16vs16 servers, why not try create several with 5v5?

 How is tech broken in 3v3?  It seems more like tech is useless when there are less people.

[nepacaka]

Once I play against tech+2 incinerators. It was bad. Actually, tech+2 any C in defensive always looking good for me

Edited by nepacaka, 01 September 2015 - 04:31 AM.

[Hyginos]

Man, if only we could have player hosted servers. Not only would we have more servers, more variety, and control over things like how many players per team, it would take some hosting cost off Reloaded.

[PoopSlinger]

Man, if only we could have player hosted servers. Not only would we have more servers, more variety, and control over things like how many players per team, it would take some hosting cost off Reloaded.

Did you give Crafty your password?

[Hyginos]

Did you give Crafty your password?

 

I've been a CraftyDus smurf all along! Bwahahahaha!

[(KDR) SethUK]

Please add a 5v5 siege on eu. It hard enough to get a full siege game going on eu and I find tdm so terribly boring.